From f6be75d03c8870be91e6e2a195648ece04b6bb16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Daney Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:29:50 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] MIPS: Calculate proper ebase value for 64-bit kernels The ebase is relative to CKSEG0 not CAC_BASE. On a 32-bit kernel they are the same thing, for a 64-bit kernel they are not. It happens to kind of work on a 64-bit kernel as they both reference the same physical memory. However since the CPU uses the CKSEG0 base, determining if a J instruction will reach always gives the wrong result unless we use the same number the CPU uses. Signed-off-by: David Daney To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/1093/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle --- arch/mips/kernel/traps.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/traps.c b/arch/mips/kernel/traps.c index 4e00f9bc23ee..1a4dd657ccb9 100644 --- a/arch/mips/kernel/traps.c +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/traps.c @@ -1599,7 +1599,7 @@ void __init trap_init(void) ebase = (unsigned long) __alloc_bootmem(size, 1 << fls(size), 0); } else { - ebase = CAC_BASE; + ebase = CKSEG0; if (cpu_has_mips_r2) ebase += (read_c0_ebase() & 0x3ffff000); } -- 2.30.2