From f37f2c62a28e848e06399ea2f9be1e098212625c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bernard Pidoux Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 17:03:22 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] rose: Wrong list_lock argument in rose_node seqops In rose_node_start() as well as in rose_node_stop() __acquires() and spin_lock_bh() were wrongly passing rose_neigh_list_lock instead of rose_node_list_lock arguments. Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/rose/rose_route.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/rose/rose_route.c b/net/rose/rose_route.c index 5053a53ba24f..bd593871c81e 100644 --- a/net/rose/rose_route.c +++ b/net/rose/rose_route.c @@ -1066,12 +1066,12 @@ out: #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS static void *rose_node_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos) - __acquires(rose_neigh_list_lock) + __acquires(rose_node_list_lock) { struct rose_node *rose_node; int i = 1; - spin_lock_bh(&rose_neigh_list_lock); + spin_lock_bh(&rose_node_list_lock); if (*pos == 0) return SEQ_START_TOKEN; @@ -1090,9 +1090,9 @@ static void *rose_node_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos) } static void rose_node_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v) - __releases(rose_neigh_list_lock) + __releases(rose_node_list_lock) { - spin_unlock_bh(&rose_neigh_list_lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&rose_node_list_lock); } static int rose_node_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v) -- 2.30.2