From efe1881f5482f94f5e5e6cb74bf3ea72f2b5b9ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Artem Bityutskiy Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 14:06:06 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] UBIFS: do not treat ENOSPC specially 'ubifs_garbage_collect_leb()' should never return '-ENOSPC', and if it does, this is an error. Thus, do not treat this error code specially. '-EAGAIN' is a special error code, but not '-ENOSPC'. Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy --- fs/ubifs/gc.c | 12 +++++------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ubifs/gc.c b/fs/ubifs/gc.c index f89a422ca395..ee4b05de4d48 100644 --- a/fs/ubifs/gc.c +++ b/fs/ubifs/gc.c @@ -677,14 +677,12 @@ int ubifs_garbage_collect(struct ubifs_info *c, int anyway) ret = ubifs_garbage_collect_leb(c, &lp); if (ret < 0) { - if (ret == -EAGAIN || ret == -ENOSPC) { + if (ret == -EAGAIN) { /* - * These codes are not errors, so we have to - * return the LEB to lprops. But if the - * 'ubifs_return_leb()' function fails, its - * failure code is propagated to the caller - * instead of the original '-EAGAIN' or - * '-ENOSPC'. + * This is not error, so we have to return the + * LEB to lprops. But if 'ubifs_return_leb()' + * fails, its failure code is propagated to the + * caller instead of the original '-EAGAIN'. */ err = ubifs_return_leb(c, lp.lnum); if (err) -- 2.30.2