From ec4e0e2fe018992d980910db901637c814575914 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ken Chen Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:41:57 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] sched: fix inconsistency when redistribute per-cpu tg->cfs_rq shares Impact: make load-balancing more consistent In the update_shares() path leading to tg_shares_up(), the calculation of per-cpu cfs_rq shares is rather erratic even under moderate task wake up rate. The problem is that the per-cpu tg->cfs_rq load weight used in the sd_rq_weight aggregation and actual redistribution of the cfs_rq->shares are collected at different time. Under moderate system load, we've seen quite a bit of variation on the cfs_rq->shares and ultimately wildly affects sched_entity's load weight. This patch caches the result of initial per-cpu load weight when doing the sum calculation, and then pass it down to update_group_shares_cpu() for redistributing per-cpu cfs_rq shares. This allows consistent total cfs_rq shares across all CPUs. It also simplifies the rounding and zero load weight check. Signed-off-by: Ken Chen Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/sched.c | 41 +++++++++++++++-------------------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c index a4c156d9a4a5..93bfb086e60f 100644 --- a/kernel/sched.c +++ b/kernel/sched.c @@ -1453,27 +1453,13 @@ static void update_group_shares_cpu(struct task_group *tg, int cpu, unsigned long sd_shares, unsigned long sd_rq_weight) { - int boost = 0; unsigned long shares; unsigned long rq_weight; if (!tg->se[cpu]) return; - rq_weight = tg->cfs_rq[cpu]->load.weight; - - /* - * If there are currently no tasks on the cpu pretend there is one of - * average load so that when a new task gets to run here it will not - * get delayed by group starvation. - */ - if (!rq_weight) { - boost = 1; - rq_weight = NICE_0_LOAD; - } - - if (unlikely(rq_weight > sd_rq_weight)) - rq_weight = sd_rq_weight; + rq_weight = tg->cfs_rq[cpu]->rq_weight; /* * \Sum shares * rq_weight @@ -1481,7 +1467,7 @@ update_group_shares_cpu(struct task_group *tg, int cpu, * \Sum rq_weight * */ - shares = (sd_shares * rq_weight) / (sd_rq_weight + 1); + shares = (sd_shares * rq_weight) / sd_rq_weight; shares = clamp_t(unsigned long, shares, MIN_SHARES, MAX_SHARES); if (abs(shares - tg->se[cpu]->load.weight) > @@ -1490,11 +1476,7 @@ update_group_shares_cpu(struct task_group *tg, int cpu, unsigned long flags; spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags); - /* - * record the actual number of shares, not the boosted amount. - */ - tg->cfs_rq[cpu]->shares = boost ? 0 : shares; - tg->cfs_rq[cpu]->rq_weight = rq_weight; + tg->cfs_rq[cpu]->shares = shares; __set_se_shares(tg->se[cpu], shares); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags); @@ -1508,13 +1490,23 @@ update_group_shares_cpu(struct task_group *tg, int cpu, */ static int tg_shares_up(struct task_group *tg, void *data) { - unsigned long rq_weight = 0; + unsigned long weight, rq_weight = 0; unsigned long shares = 0; struct sched_domain *sd = data; int i; for_each_cpu_mask(i, sd->span) { - rq_weight += tg->cfs_rq[i]->load.weight; + /* + * If there are currently no tasks on the cpu pretend there + * is one of average load so that when a new task gets to + * run here it will not get delayed by group starvation. + */ + weight = tg->cfs_rq[i]->load.weight; + if (!weight) + weight = NICE_0_LOAD; + + tg->cfs_rq[i]->rq_weight = weight; + rq_weight += weight; shares += tg->cfs_rq[i]->shares; } @@ -1524,9 +1516,6 @@ static int tg_shares_up(struct task_group *tg, void *data) if (!sd->parent || !(sd->parent->flags & SD_LOAD_BALANCE)) shares = tg->shares; - if (!rq_weight) - rq_weight = cpus_weight(sd->span) * NICE_0_LOAD; - for_each_cpu_mask(i, sd->span) update_group_shares_cpu(tg, i, shares, rq_weight); -- 2.30.2