From e9c0dfbaa28b7c9f5d3482633770cdeec53e3f7b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 13:30:16 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] net: sctp: sctp_v6_get_dst: fix boolean test in dst cache We walk through the bind address list and try to get the best source address for a given destination. However, currently, we take the 'continue' path of the loop when an entry is invalid (!laddr->valid) *and* the entry state does not equal SCTP_ADDR_SRC (laddr->state != SCTP_ADDR_SRC). Thus, still, invalid entries with SCTP_ADDR_SRC might not 'continue' as well as valid entries with SCTP_ADDR_{NEW, SRC, DEL}, with a possible false baddr and matchlen as a result, causing in worst case dst route to be false or possibly NULL. This test should actually be a '||' instead of '&&'. But lets fix it and make this a bit easier to read by having the condition the same way as similarly done in sctp_v4_get_dst. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich Acked-by: Neil Horman Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/sctp/ipv6.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/sctp/ipv6.c b/net/sctp/ipv6.c index f3f0f4dc31dd..391a245d5203 100644 --- a/net/sctp/ipv6.c +++ b/net/sctp/ipv6.c @@ -326,9 +326,10 @@ static void sctp_v6_get_dst(struct sctp_transport *t, union sctp_addr *saddr, */ rcu_read_lock(); list_for_each_entry_rcu(laddr, &bp->address_list, list) { - if (!laddr->valid && laddr->state != SCTP_ADDR_SRC) + if (!laddr->valid) continue; - if ((laddr->a.sa.sa_family == AF_INET6) && + if ((laddr->state == SCTP_ADDR_SRC) && + (laddr->a.sa.sa_family == AF_INET6) && (scope <= sctp_scope(&laddr->a))) { bmatchlen = sctp_v6_addr_match_len(daddr, &laddr->a); if (!baddr || (matchlen < bmatchlen)) { -- 2.30.2