From e6280f26b43775d8fa0c54e50c92491cfccbf738 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Malli Chilakala Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 13:06:23 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] e100: Increased delay loop for command blocks Increased delay loop for command blocks Signed-off-by: Mallikarjuna R Chilakala Signed-off-by: Ganesh Venkatesan Signed-off-by: John Ronciak Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik --- drivers/net/e100.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/e100.c b/drivers/net/e100.c index e0fcac889a5a..09448ec48a79 100644 --- a/drivers/net/e100.c +++ b/drivers/net/e100.c @@ -785,6 +785,7 @@ static int e100_eeprom_save(struct nic *nic, u16 start, u16 count) } #define E100_WAIT_SCB_TIMEOUT 20000 /* we might have to wait 100ms!!! */ +#define E100_WAIT_SCB_FAST 20 /* delay like the old code */ static inline int e100_exec_cmd(struct nic *nic, u8 cmd, dma_addr_t dma_addr) { unsigned long flags; @@ -798,7 +799,7 @@ static inline int e100_exec_cmd(struct nic *nic, u8 cmd, dma_addr_t dma_addr) if(likely(!readb(&nic->csr->scb.cmd_lo))) break; cpu_relax(); - if(unlikely(i > (E100_WAIT_SCB_TIMEOUT >> 1))) + if(unlikely(i > E100_WAIT_SCB_FAST)) udelay(5); } if(unlikely(i == E100_WAIT_SCB_TIMEOUT)) { -- 2.30.2