From e50928d7213e72ee95507221a89ed07d2bb6517b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andy Lutomirski Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 14:45:29 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] x86/fault: Fix SMAP #PF handling buglet for implicit supervisor accesses Currently, if a user program somehow triggers an implicit supervisor access to a user address (e.g. if the kernel somehow sets LDTR to a user address), it will be incorrectly detected as a SMAP violation if AC is clear and SMAP is enabled. This is incorrect -- the error has nothing to do with SMAP. Fix the condition so that only accesses with the hardware USER bit set are diagnosed as SMAP violations. With the logic fixed, an implicit supervisor access to a user address will hit the code lower in the function that is intended to handle it even if SMAP is enabled. That logic is still a bit buggy, and later patches will clean it up. I *think* this code is still correct for WRUSS, and I've added a comment to that effect. Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Brian Gerst Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Denys Vlasenko Cc: H. Peter Anvin Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Rik van Riel Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Yu-cheng Yu Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/d1d1b2e66ef31f884dba172084486ea9423ddcdb.1542667307.git.luto@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c index 9d092ab74f18..7a69b66cf071 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c @@ -1235,12 +1235,15 @@ void do_user_addr_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, pgtable_bad(regs, hw_error_code, address); /* - * If SMAP is on, check for invalid kernel (supervisor) - * access to user pages in the user address space. + * If SMAP is on, check for invalid kernel (supervisor) access to user + * pages in the user address space. The odd case here is WRUSS, + * which, according to the preliminary documentation, does not respect + * SMAP and will have the USER bit set so, in all cases, SMAP + * enforcement appears to be consistent with the USER bit. */ if (unlikely(cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SMAP) && !(hw_error_code & X86_PF_USER) && - (user_mode(regs) || !(regs->flags & X86_EFLAGS_AC)))) + !(regs->flags & X86_EFLAGS_AC))) { bad_area_nosemaphore(regs, hw_error_code, address); return; -- 2.30.2