From e48e9c429a95e6ff103bb830f07e2e6a6954a839 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kalle Valo Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 09:45:07 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Revert "ath10k: fix napi_poll budget overflow" Thorsten reported on that commit c9353bf483d3 made ath10k unstable with QCA6174 on his Dell XPS13 (9360) with an error message: ath10k_pci 0000:3a:00.0: failed to extract amsdu: -11 It only seemed to happen with certain APs, not all, but when it happened the only way to get ath10k working was to switch the wifi off and on with a hotkey. As this commit made things even worse (a warning vs breaking the whole connection) let's revert the commit for now and while the issue is being fixed. Link: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/ath10k/2017-October/010227.html Reported-by: Thorsten Leemhuis Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo --- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c | 17 ++++++----------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c index 5beb6ee0f091..0aeeb233af78 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c @@ -1818,8 +1818,7 @@ static void ath10k_htt_rx_delba(struct ath10k *ar, struct htt_resp *resp) } static int ath10k_htt_rx_extract_amsdu(struct sk_buff_head *list, - struct sk_buff_head *amsdu, - int budget_left) + struct sk_buff_head *amsdu) { struct sk_buff *msdu; struct htt_rx_desc *rxd; @@ -1830,9 +1829,8 @@ static int ath10k_htt_rx_extract_amsdu(struct sk_buff_head *list, if (WARN_ON(!skb_queue_empty(amsdu))) return -EINVAL; - while ((msdu = __skb_dequeue(list)) && budget_left) { + while ((msdu = __skb_dequeue(list))) { __skb_queue_tail(amsdu, msdu); - budget_left--; rxd = (void *)msdu->data - sizeof(*rxd); if (rxd->msdu_end.common.info0 & @@ -1923,8 +1921,7 @@ static int ath10k_htt_rx_h_rx_offload(struct ath10k *ar, return num_msdu; } -static int ath10k_htt_rx_in_ord_ind(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb, - int budget_left) +static int ath10k_htt_rx_in_ord_ind(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb) { struct ath10k_htt *htt = &ar->htt; struct htt_resp *resp = (void *)skb->data; @@ -1981,9 +1978,9 @@ static int ath10k_htt_rx_in_ord_ind(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb, if (offload) num_msdus = ath10k_htt_rx_h_rx_offload(ar, &list); - while (!skb_queue_empty(&list) && budget_left) { + while (!skb_queue_empty(&list)) { __skb_queue_head_init(&amsdu); - ret = ath10k_htt_rx_extract_amsdu(&list, &amsdu, budget_left); + ret = ath10k_htt_rx_extract_amsdu(&list, &amsdu); switch (ret) { case 0: /* Note: The in-order indication may report interleaved @@ -1993,7 +1990,6 @@ static int ath10k_htt_rx_in_ord_ind(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb, * should still give an idea about rx rate to the user. */ num_msdus += skb_queue_len(&amsdu); - budget_left -= skb_queue_len(&amsdu); ath10k_htt_rx_h_ppdu(ar, &amsdu, status, vdev_id); ath10k_htt_rx_h_filter(ar, &amsdu, status); ath10k_htt_rx_h_mpdu(ar, &amsdu, status, false); @@ -2636,8 +2632,7 @@ int ath10k_htt_txrx_compl_task(struct ath10k *ar, int budget) } spin_lock_bh(&htt->rx_ring.lock); - num_rx_msdus = ath10k_htt_rx_in_ord_ind(ar, skb, - (budget - quota)); + num_rx_msdus = ath10k_htt_rx_in_ord_ind(ar, skb); spin_unlock_bh(&htt->rx_ring.lock); if (num_rx_msdus < 0) { resched_napi = true; -- 2.30.2