From dd9239900e12db84c198855b262ae7796db1123b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yafang Shao Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 20:52:11 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] mm/memcontrol: fix wrong statistics in memory.stat When we calculate total statistics for memcg1_stats and memcg1_events, we use the the index 'i' in the for loop as the events index. Actually we should use memcg1_stats[i] and memcg1_events[i] as the events index. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1562116978-19539-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com Fixes: 42a300353577 ("mm: memcontrol: fix recursive statistics correctness & scalabilty"). Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Johannes Weiner Cc: Yafang Shao Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- mm/memcontrol.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index ba9138a4a1de..591eafafbd8c 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -3530,12 +3530,13 @@ static int memcg_stat_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) if (memcg1_stats[i] == MEMCG_SWAP && !do_memsw_account()) continue; seq_printf(m, "total_%s %llu\n", memcg1_stat_names[i], - (u64)memcg_page_state(memcg, i) * PAGE_SIZE); + (u64)memcg_page_state(memcg, memcg1_stats[i]) * + PAGE_SIZE); } for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(memcg1_events); i++) seq_printf(m, "total_%s %llu\n", memcg1_event_names[i], - (u64)memcg_events(memcg, i)); + (u64)memcg_events(memcg, memcg1_events[i])); for (i = 0; i < NR_LRU_LISTS; i++) seq_printf(m, "total_%s %llu\n", mem_cgroup_lru_names[i], -- 2.30.2