From c2558aba9439df62e11983a53496b1cd8b983242 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:44:31 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Hello,

I've explained the problem at https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/4115
This is my first patch to OpenWRT so please be lenient.

The 160-stack-protector.patch deletes the section in configure of cups which switches on the stack-protector.
In the Makefile the css files are missing.

Signed-off-by: Heiner Kempken <inf23@web.de>

SVN-Revision: 13044
---
 net/cups/patches/160-stack-protector.patch | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 net/cups/patches/160-stack-protector.patch

diff --git a/net/cups/patches/160-stack-protector.patch b/net/cups/patches/160-stack-protector.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..f26b7472e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/net/cups/patches/160-stack-protector.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+--- cups-1.3.7/configure.old	2008-10-19 23:29:10.000000000 +0200
++++ cups-1.3.7/configure	2008-10-19 23:31:10.000000000 +0200
+@@ -10115,59 +10115,6 @@
+     		OPTIM="-fPIC $OPTIM"
+ 	fi
+
+-	# The -fstack-protector option is available with some versions of
+-	# GCC and adds "stack canaries" which detect when the return address
+-	# has been overwritten, preventing many types of exploit attacks.
+-	{ echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking if GCC supports -fstack-protector" >&5
+-echo $ECHO_N "checking if GCC supports -fstack-protector... $ECHO_C" >&6; }
+-	OLDCFLAGS="$CFLAGS"
+-	CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -fstack-protector"
+-	cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF
+-/* confdefs.h.  */
+-_ACEOF
+-cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext
+-cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF
+-/* end confdefs.h.  */
+-
+-int
+-main ()
+-{
+-
+-  ;
+-  return 0;
+-}
+-_ACEOF
+-rm -f conftest.$ac_objext
+-if { (ac_try="$ac_compile"
+-case "(($ac_try" in
+-  *\"* | *\`* | *\\*) ac_try_echo=\$ac_try;;
+-  *) ac_try_echo=$ac_try;;
+-esac
+-eval "echo \"\$as_me:$LINENO: $ac_try_echo\"") >&5
+-  (eval "$ac_compile") 2>conftest.er1
+-  ac_status=$?
+-  grep -v '^ *+' conftest.er1 >conftest.err
+-  rm -f conftest.er1
+-  cat conftest.err >&5
+-  echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5
+-  (exit $ac_status); } && {
+-	 test -z "$ac_c_werror_flag" ||
+-	 test ! -s conftest.err
+-       } && test -s conftest.$ac_objext; then
+-  OPTIM="$OPTIM -fstack-protector"
+-		{ echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: yes" >&5
+-echo "${ECHO_T}yes" >&6; }
+-else
+-  echo "$as_me: failed program was:" >&5
+-sed 's/^/| /' conftest.$ac_ext >&5
+-
+-	{ echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: no" >&5
+-echo "${ECHO_T}no" >&6; }
+-fi
+-
+-rm -f core conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext
+-	CFLAGS="$OLDCFLAGS"
+-
+ 	# The -pie option is available with some versions of GCC and adds
+ 	# randomization of addresses, which avoids another class of exploits
+ 	# that depend on a fixed address for common functions.
-- 
2.30.2