From a7ea67823af4a7e442e92064b0fab46603a588f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefan Richter Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 11:06:55 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] firewire: don't respond to broadcast write requests Contrary to a comment in the source, request->ack of a broadcast write request can be ACK_PENDING. Hence the existing check is insufficient. Debug dmesg before: AR spd 0 tl 00, ffc0 -> ffff, ack_pending , QW req, fffff0000234 = ffffffff AT spd 0 tl 00, ffff -> ffc0, ack_complete, W resp And the requesting node (linux1394) reports an unsolicited response. Debug dmesg after: AR spd 0 tl 00, ffc0 -> ffff, ack_pending , QW req, fffff0000234 = ffffffff Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter --- drivers/firewire/fw-transaction.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/firewire/fw-transaction.c b/drivers/firewire/fw-transaction.c index 2f11ed1acf01..40db80752272 100644 --- a/drivers/firewire/fw-transaction.c +++ b/drivers/firewire/fw-transaction.c @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ #define HEADER_GET_DATA_LENGTH(q) (((q) >> 16) & 0xffff) #define HEADER_GET_EXTENDED_TCODE(q) (((q) >> 0) & 0xffff) +#define HEADER_DESTINATION_IS_BROADCAST(q) \ + (((q) & HEADER_DESTINATION(0x3f)) == HEADER_DESTINATION(0x3f)) + #define PHY_CONFIG_GAP_COUNT(gap_count) (((gap_count) << 16) | (1 << 22)) #define PHY_CONFIG_ROOT_ID(node_id) ((((node_id) & 0x3f) << 24) | (1 << 23)) #define PHY_IDENTIFIER(id) ((id) << 30) @@ -624,12 +627,9 @@ allocate_request(struct fw_packet *p) void fw_send_response(struct fw_card *card, struct fw_request *request, int rcode) { - /* - * Broadcast packets are reported as ACK_COMPLETE, so this - * check is sufficient to ensure we don't send response to - * broadcast packets or posted writes. - */ - if (request->ack != ACK_PENDING) { + /* unified transaction or broadcast transaction: don't respond */ + if (request->ack != ACK_PENDING || + HEADER_DESTINATION_IS_BROADCAST(request->request_header[0])) { kfree(request); return; } -- 2.30.2