From a1ce36c0e6d8eaefef6e60baf3be9d93fafadd7e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Julia Lawall Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 21:38:05 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] staging: lustre: ldlm: ldlm_lock: remove unneeded null test before free Kfree can cope with a null argument, so drop null tests. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // @@ expression ptr; @@ - if (ptr != NULL) kfree(ptr); // Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c index 2c5fe1499ce0..6a22f4183b30 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c @@ -208,8 +208,7 @@ void ldlm_lock_put(struct ldlm_lock *lock) lock->l_export = NULL; } - if (lock->l_lvb_data != NULL) - kfree(lock->l_lvb_data); + kfree(lock->l_lvb_data); ldlm_interval_free(ldlm_interval_detach(lock)); lu_ref_fini(&lock->l_reference); -- 2.30.2