From 967ab999a090b1a4e7d3c7febfd6d89b42fb4cf4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pavel Emelyanov Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:38:52 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] netfilter: xt_hashlimit: fix race between htable_destroy and htable_gc Deleting a timer with del_timer doesn't guarantee, that the timer function is not running at the moment of deletion. Thus in the xt_hashlimit case we can get into a ticklish situation when the htable_gc rearms the timer back and we'll actually delete an entry with a pending timer. Fix it with using del_timer_sync(). AFAIK del_timer_sync checks for the timer to be pending by itself, so I remove the check. Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c b/net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c index 6809af542a2c..d9418a267812 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c +++ b/net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c @@ -367,9 +367,7 @@ static void htable_gc(unsigned long htlong) static void htable_destroy(struct xt_hashlimit_htable *hinfo) { - /* remove timer, if it is pending */ - if (timer_pending(&hinfo->timer)) - del_timer(&hinfo->timer); + del_timer_sync(&hinfo->timer); /* remove proc entry */ remove_proc_entry(hinfo->pde->name, -- 2.30.2