From 952041a8639a7a3a73a2b6573cb8aa8518bc39f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 15:03:15 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] tty/ldsem, locking/rwsem: Add missing ACQUIRE to read_failed sleep loop While reviewing rwsem down_slowpath, Will noticed ldsem had a copy of a bug we just found for rwsem. X = 0; CPU0 CPU1 rwsem_down_read() for (;;) { set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); X = 1; rwsem_up_write(); rwsem_mark_wake() atomic_long_add(adjustment, &sem->count); smp_store_release(&waiter->task, NULL); if (!waiter.task) break; ... } r = X; Allows 'r == 0'. Reported-by: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Acked-by: Will Deacon Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Hurley Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Fixes: 4898e640caf0 ("tty: Add timed, writer-prioritized rw semaphore") Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c b/drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c index 717292c1c0df..60ff236a3d63 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c +++ b/drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c @@ -93,8 +93,7 @@ static void __ldsem_wake_readers(struct ld_semaphore *sem) list_for_each_entry_safe(waiter, next, &sem->read_wait, list) { tsk = waiter->task; - smp_mb(); - waiter->task = NULL; + smp_store_release(&waiter->task, NULL); wake_up_process(tsk); put_task_struct(tsk); } @@ -194,7 +193,7 @@ down_read_failed(struct ld_semaphore *sem, long count, long timeout) for (;;) { set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); - if (!waiter.task) + if (!smp_load_acquire(&waiter.task)) break; if (!timeout) break; -- 2.30.2