From 934d96eafadcf3eb3ccd094af9919f020907fc41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:38:17 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] time-sched.c: tick_nohz_update_jiffies should be static Impact: cleanup, reduce kernel size a bit, avoid sparse warning Fixes sparse warning: kernel/time/tick-sched.c:137:6: warning: symbol 'tick_nohz_update_jiffies' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c index 1b6c05bd0d0a..d3f1ef4d5cbe 100644 --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ __setup("nohz=", setup_tick_nohz); * value. We do this unconditionally on any cpu, as we don't know whether the * cpu, which has the update task assigned is in a long sleep. */ -void tick_nohz_update_jiffies(void) +static void tick_nohz_update_jiffies(void) { int cpu = smp_processor_id(); struct tick_sched *ts = &per_cpu(tick_cpu_sched, cpu); -- 2.30.2