From 9023705192242a77f05c1647b9f0c6b55c955ecf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 17:11:48 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Input: xen-kbdfront - mark expected switch fall-through In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that in this particular case, I placed the "fall through" part at the beginning of the code comment, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114757 ("Missing break in switch") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov --- drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c b/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c index 594f72e39639..24bc5c5d876f 100644 --- a/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c +++ b/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ static void xenkbd_backend_changed(struct xenbus_device *dev, case XenbusStateClosed: if (dev->state == XenbusStateClosed) break; - /* Missed the backend's CLOSING state -- fallthrough */ + /* fall through - Missed the backend's CLOSING state */ case XenbusStateClosing: xenbus_frontend_closed(dev); break; -- 2.30.2