From 8f15b82e22779fd44baeb78515c9c154b407eff0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:25:08 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] x86: move setup_secondary_clock a little bit down in the function This is done so we call setup_secondary_clock() in the same place x86_64 does. A separate patch for this is appearantly not needed. But clock initialization is such a delicate thing, that it's safer to do this way Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/kernel/smpboot_32.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot_32.c index 6c16165abf11..4e5416eb42b0 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot_32.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot_32.c @@ -185,7 +185,6 @@ static void __cpuinit start_secondary(void *unused) */ check_tsc_sync_target(); - setup_secondary_clock(); if (nmi_watchdog == NMI_IO_APIC) { disable_8259A_irq(0); enable_NMI_through_LVT0(); @@ -214,6 +213,8 @@ static void __cpuinit start_secondary(void *unused) unlock_ipi_call_lock(); per_cpu(cpu_state, smp_processor_id()) = CPU_ONLINE; + setup_secondary_clock(); + wmb(); cpu_idle(); } -- 2.30.2