From 8053fc3de720e1027d690f892ff7d7c1737fdd9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Herbert Xu Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:07:34 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] [IPSEC]: Temporarily remove locks around copying of non-atomic fields The change 050f009e16f908932070313c1745d09dc69fd62b [IPSEC]: Lock state when copying non-atomic fields to user-space caused a regression. Ingo Molnar reports that it causes a potential dead-lock found by the lock validator as it tries to take x->lock within xfrm_state_lock while numerous other sites take the locks in opposite order. For 2.6.24, the best fix is to simply remove the added locks as that puts us back in the same state as we've been in for years. For later kernels a proper fix would be to reverse the locking order for every xfrm state user such that if x->lock is taken together with xfrm_state_lock then it is to be taken within it. Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu --- net/key/af_key.c | 2 -- net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 2 -- 2 files changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/key/af_key.c b/net/key/af_key.c index 3b2d864ab942..878039b9557d 100644 --- a/net/key/af_key.c +++ b/net/key/af_key.c @@ -1015,9 +1015,7 @@ static inline struct sk_buff *pfkey_xfrm_state2msg(struct xfrm_state *x) { struct sk_buff *skb; - spin_lock_bh(&x->lock); skb = __pfkey_xfrm_state2msg(x, 1, 3); - spin_unlock_bh(&x->lock); return skb; } diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c index d41588d101d0..e75dbdcb08a4 100644 --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c @@ -507,7 +507,6 @@ static int copy_to_user_state_extra(struct xfrm_state *x, struct xfrm_usersa_info *p, struct sk_buff *skb) { - spin_lock_bh(&x->lock); copy_to_user_state(x, p); if (x->coaddr) @@ -515,7 +514,6 @@ static int copy_to_user_state_extra(struct xfrm_state *x, if (x->lastused) NLA_PUT_U64(skb, XFRMA_LASTUSED, x->lastused); - spin_unlock_bh(&x->lock); if (x->aalg) NLA_PUT(skb, XFRMA_ALG_AUTH, alg_len(x->aalg), x->aalg); -- 2.30.2