From 7fcd53303de8dbbed863f6471ca92eb96a1faa28 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Al Viro Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 17:43:48 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] nfsd4_lock() returns bogus values to clients missing nfserrno() in default case of a switch by return value of posix_lock_file(); as the result we send negative host-endian to clients that expect positive network-endian, preferably mentioned in RFC... BTW, that case is not impossible - posix_lock_file() can return -ENOLCK and we do not handle that one explicitly. Signed-off-by: Al Viro Signed-off-by: Neil Brown Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c index 856ed4fd662b..1143cfb64549 100644 --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c @@ -2761,7 +2761,10 @@ nfsd4_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *current_fh, struct nfsd4_lock goto conflicting_lock; case (EDEADLK): status = nfserr_deadlock; + dprintk("NFSD: nfsd4_lock: posix_lock_file() failed! status %d\n",status); + goto out; default: + status = nfserrno(status); dprintk("NFSD: nfsd4_lock: posix_lock_file() failed! status %d\n",status); goto out; } -- 2.30.2