From 7ec18ab923a2e377ecb05c74a2d38f457f79950f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christoph Hellwig Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:08:12 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] [POWERPC] spufs: streamline locking for isolated spu setup For quite a while now spu state is protected by a simple mutex instead of the old rw_semaphore, and this means we can simplify the locking around spu_setup_isolated a lot. Instead of doing an spu_release before entering spu_setup_isolated and then calling the complicated spu_acquire_exclusive we can now simply enter the function locked an in guaranteed runnable state, so that the only bit of spu_acquire_exclusive that's left is the call to spu_unmap_mappings. Similarly there's no more need to unlock and reacquire the state_mutex when spu_setup_isolated is done, but we can always return with the lock held and only drop it in spu_run_init in the failure case. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann --- arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/context.c | 40 --------------------- arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/run.c | 30 ++++++++-------- arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/spufs.h | 1 - 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/context.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/context.c index 065147fb1cc2..ce17a2847184 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/context.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/context.c @@ -121,46 +121,6 @@ void spu_unmap_mappings(struct spu_context *ctx) unmap_mapping_range(ctx->psmap, 0, 0x20000, 1); } -/** - * spu_acquire_exclusive - lock spu contex and protect against userspace access - * @ctx: spu contex to lock - * - * Note: - * Returns 0 and with the context locked on success - * Returns negative error and with the context _unlocked_ on failure. - */ -int spu_acquire_exclusive(struct spu_context *ctx) -{ - int ret = -EINVAL; - - spu_acquire(ctx); - /* - * Context is about to be freed, so we can't acquire it anymore. - */ - if (!ctx->owner) - goto out_unlock; - - if (ctx->state == SPU_STATE_SAVED) { - ret = spu_activate(ctx, 0); - if (ret) - goto out_unlock; - } else { - /* - * We need to exclude userspace access to the context. - * - * To protect against memory access we invalidate all ptes - * and make sure the pagefault handlers block on the mutex. - */ - spu_unmap_mappings(ctx); - } - - return 0; - - out_unlock: - spu_release(ctx); - return ret; -} - /** * spu_acquire_runnable - lock spu contex and make sure it is in runnable state * @ctx: spu contex to lock diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/run.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/run.c index f95a611ca362..7df5202c9a90 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/run.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/run.c @@ -63,13 +63,18 @@ static int spu_setup_isolated(struct spu_context *ctx) const u32 status_loading = SPU_STATUS_RUNNING | SPU_STATUS_ISOLATED_STATE | SPU_STATUS_ISOLATED_LOAD_STATUS; + ret = -ENODEV; if (!isolated_loader) - return -ENODEV; - - ret = spu_acquire_exclusive(ctx); - if (ret) goto out; + /* + * We need to exclude userspace access to the context. + * + * To protect against memory access we invalidate all ptes + * and make sure the pagefault handlers block on the mutex. + */ + spu_unmap_mappings(ctx); + mfc_cntl = &ctx->spu->priv2->mfc_control_RW; /* purge the MFC DMA queue to ensure no spurious accesses before we @@ -82,7 +87,7 @@ static int spu_setup_isolated(struct spu_context *ctx) printk(KERN_ERR "%s: timeout flushing MFC DMA queue\n", __FUNCTION__); ret = -EIO; - goto out_unlock; + goto out; } cond_resched(); } @@ -119,12 +124,15 @@ static int spu_setup_isolated(struct spu_context *ctx) pr_debug("%s: isolated LOAD failed\n", __FUNCTION__); ctx->ops->runcntl_write(ctx, SPU_RUNCNTL_RUNNABLE); ret = -EACCES; + goto out_drop_priv; + } - } else if (!(status & SPU_STATUS_ISOLATED_STATE)) { + if (!(status & SPU_STATUS_ISOLATED_STATE)) { /* This isn't allowed by the CBEA, but check anyway */ pr_debug("%s: SPU fell out of isolated mode?\n", __FUNCTION__); ctx->ops->runcntl_write(ctx, SPU_RUNCNTL_STOP); ret = -EINVAL; + goto out_drop_priv; } out_drop_priv: @@ -132,8 +140,6 @@ out_drop_priv: sr1 |= MFC_STATE1_PROBLEM_STATE_MASK; spu_mfc_sr1_set(ctx->spu, sr1); -out_unlock: - spu_release(ctx); out: return ret; } @@ -149,13 +155,9 @@ static inline int spu_run_init(struct spu_context *ctx, u32 * npc) if (ctx->flags & SPU_CREATE_ISOLATE) { if (!(ctx->ops->status_read(ctx) & SPU_STATUS_ISOLATED_STATE)) { - /* Need to release ctx, because spu_setup_isolated will - * acquire it exclusively. - */ - spu_release(ctx); ret = spu_setup_isolated(ctx); - if (!ret) - ret = spu_acquire_runnable(ctx, 0); + if (ret) + spu_release(ctx); } /* if userspace has set the runcntrl register (eg, to issue an diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/spufs.h b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/spufs.h index 0fb366d9d257..cae2ad435b0a 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/spufs.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/spufs.h @@ -192,7 +192,6 @@ void spu_unmap_mappings(struct spu_context *ctx); void spu_forget(struct spu_context *ctx); int spu_acquire_runnable(struct spu_context *ctx, unsigned long flags); void spu_acquire_saved(struct spu_context *ctx); -int spu_acquire_exclusive(struct spu_context *ctx); int spu_activate(struct spu_context *ctx, unsigned long flags); void spu_deactivate(struct spu_context *ctx); -- 2.30.2