From 7cf9c19a836a79c60deef63714cb2880246d9a85 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Boris Brezillon Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 19:53:40 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] mtd: nand: bch: switch to mtd_ooblayout_ops Replace the nand_ecclayout definition by the equivalent mtd_ooblayout_ops definition. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon --- drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 15 +++++++++++++ drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bch.c | 41 ++++++++++-------------------------- 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c index e8332ea45739..6c84a40dbddb 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c @@ -4294,6 +4294,21 @@ int nand_scan_tail(struct mtd_info *mtd) ecc->strength = 4; } + /* + * if no ecc placement scheme was provided pickup the default + * large page one. + */ + if (!mtd->ooblayout) { + /* handle large page devices only */ + if (mtd->oobsize < 64) { + WARN(1, "OOB layout is required when using software BCH on small pages\n"); + ret = -EINVAL; + goto err_free; + } + + mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, &nand_ooblayout_lp_ops); + } + /* See nand_bch_init() for details. */ ecc->bytes = 0; ecc->priv = nand_bch_init(mtd); diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bch.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bch.c index d8c03ebb62dc..1dbc418baac4 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bch.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bch.c @@ -32,13 +32,11 @@ /** * struct nand_bch_control - private NAND BCH control structure * @bch: BCH control structure - * @ecclayout: private ecc layout for this BCH configuration * @errloc: error location array * @eccmask: XOR ecc mask, allows erased pages to be decoded as valid */ struct nand_bch_control { struct bch_control *bch; - struct nand_ecclayout ecclayout; unsigned int *errloc; unsigned char *eccmask; }; @@ -124,7 +122,6 @@ struct nand_bch_control *nand_bch_init(struct mtd_info *mtd) { struct nand_chip *nand = mtd_to_nand(mtd); unsigned int m, t, eccsteps, i; - struct nand_ecclayout *layout = nand->ecc.layout; struct nand_bch_control *nbc = NULL; unsigned char *erased_page; unsigned int eccsize = nand->ecc.size; @@ -161,34 +158,18 @@ struct nand_bch_control *nand_bch_init(struct mtd_info *mtd) eccsteps = mtd->writesize/eccsize; - /* if no ecc placement scheme was provided, build one */ - if (!layout) { - - /* handle large page devices only */ - if (mtd->oobsize < 64) { - printk(KERN_WARNING "must provide an oob scheme for " - "oobsize %d\n", mtd->oobsize); - goto fail; - } - - layout = &nbc->ecclayout; - layout->eccbytes = eccsteps*eccbytes; - - /* reserve 2 bytes for bad block marker */ - if (layout->eccbytes+2 > mtd->oobsize) { - printk(KERN_WARNING "no suitable oob scheme available " - "for oobsize %d eccbytes %u\n", mtd->oobsize, - eccbytes); - goto fail; - } - /* put ecc bytes at oob tail */ - for (i = 0; i < layout->eccbytes; i++) - layout->eccpos[i] = mtd->oobsize-layout->eccbytes+i; - - layout->oobfree[0].offset = 2; - layout->oobfree[0].length = mtd->oobsize-2-layout->eccbytes; + /* + * Rely on the default ecclayout to ooblayout wrapper provided by MTD + * core if ecc.layout is not NULL. + * FIXME: this should be removed when all callers have moved to the + * mtd_ooblayout_ops approach. + */ + mtd_set_ecclayout(mtd, nand->ecc.layout); - nand->ecc.layout = layout; + /* Check that we have an oob layout description. */ + if (!mtd->ooblayout) { + pr_warn("missing oob scheme"); + goto fail; } /* sanity checks */ -- 2.30.2