From 75b245b3259133360845bc6de3aecb8a6bd6ab59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Renninger Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 01:29:00 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] [ACPI] fix passive cooling regression Return logic was inverted. Going for changing the return value to not return zero as it is makes more sense regarding the naming of the function (cpu_has_cpufreq()). http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3410 Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger Signed-off-by: Len Brown --- drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c index f37584015324..dc9817cfb882 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c @@ -102,8 +102,8 @@ static int cpu_has_cpufreq(unsigned int cpu) { struct cpufreq_policy policy; if (!acpi_thermal_cpufreq_is_init || cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu)) - return -ENODEV; - return 0; + return 0; + return 1; } static int acpi_thermal_cpufreq_increase(unsigned int cpu) -- 2.30.2