From 70fd136ecc44ca8c364f4412f447de1d940c3639 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Al Viro Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 09:50:11 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] ntfs: don't call invalidate_inodes() We are in fill_super(); again, no inodes with zero i_count could be around until we set MS_ACTIVE. Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- fs/ntfs/super.c | 15 --------------- 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ntfs/super.c b/fs/ntfs/super.c index 19c5180f8a28..d4dec2d32117 100644 --- a/fs/ntfs/super.c +++ b/fs/ntfs/super.c @@ -3021,21 +3021,6 @@ iput_tmp_ino_err_out_now: if (vol->mft_ino && vol->mft_ino != tmp_ino) iput(vol->mft_ino); vol->mft_ino = NULL; - /* - * This is needed to get ntfs_clear_extent_inode() called for each - * inode we have ever called ntfs_iget()/iput() on, otherwise we A) - * leak resources and B) a subsequent mount fails automatically due to - * ntfs_iget() never calling down into our ntfs_read_locked_inode() - * method again... FIXME: Do we need to do this twice now because of - * attribute inodes? I think not, so leave as is for now... (AIA) - */ - if (invalidate_inodes(sb)) { - ntfs_error(sb, "Busy inodes left. This is most likely a NTFS " - "driver bug."); - /* Copied from fs/super.c. I just love this message. (-; */ - printk("NTFS: Busy inodes after umount. Self-destruct in 5 " - "seconds. Have a nice day...\n"); - } /* Errors at this stage are irrelevant. */ err_out_now: sb->s_fs_info = NULL; -- 2.30.2