From 6e062b60b0b1bd82cac475e63cdb8c451647182b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Wilson Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 13:51:55 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/execlists: Mark up priority boost on preemption Record the priority boost we giving to the preempted client or else we may end up in a situation where the priority queue no longer matches the request priority order and so we can end up in an infinite loop of preempting the same pair of requests. Fixes: e9eaf82d97a2 ("drm/i915: Priority boost for waiting clients") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190123135155.21562-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c index 436e59724900..8aa8a4862543 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c @@ -302,6 +302,7 @@ static void __unwind_incomplete_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) */ if (!(prio & I915_PRIORITY_NEWCLIENT)) { prio |= I915_PRIORITY_NEWCLIENT; + active->sched.attr.priority = prio; list_move_tail(&active->sched.link, i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine, prio)); } @@ -625,6 +626,9 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) int i; priolist_for_each_request_consume(rq, rn, p, i) { + GEM_BUG_ON(last && + need_preempt(engine, last, rq_prio(rq))); + /* * Can we combine this request with the current port? * It has to be the same context/ringbuffer and not -- 2.30.2