From 6bfb7c7434f75d29241413dc7e784295ba56de98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Viresh Kumar Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 08:36:14 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: remove redundant CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE notifier event What's being done from CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE, can also be done with CPUFREQ_ADJUST. There is nothing special with CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE notifier. Kill CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE and fix its usage sites. This also updates the numbering of notifier events to remove holes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- Documentation/cpu-freq/core.txt | 7 ++----- drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 2 +- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 4 ---- drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c | 4 ++-- drivers/video/fbdev/pxafb.c | 1 - drivers/video/fbdev/sa1100fb.c | 1 - include/linux/cpufreq.h | 9 ++++----- 7 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/cpu-freq/core.txt b/Documentation/cpu-freq/core.txt index 70933eadc308..ba78e7c2a069 100644 --- a/Documentation/cpu-freq/core.txt +++ b/Documentation/cpu-freq/core.txt @@ -55,16 +55,13 @@ transition notifiers. ---------------------------- These are notified when a new policy is intended to be set. Each -CPUFreq policy notifier is called three times for a policy transition: +CPUFreq policy notifier is called twice for a policy transition: 1.) During CPUFREQ_ADJUST all CPUFreq notifiers may change the limit if they see a need for this - may it be thermal considerations or hardware limitations. -2.) During CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE only changes may be done in order to avoid - hardware failure. - -3.) And during CPUFREQ_NOTIFY all notifiers are informed of the new policy +2.) And during CPUFREQ_NOTIFY all notifiers are informed of the new policy - if two hardware drivers failed to agree on a new policy before this stage, the incompatible hardware shall be shut down, and the user informed of this. diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c index 36b6da2918a6..91941f1cdecb 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_ppc_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, if (ignore_ppc) return 0; - if (event != CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE) + if (event != CPUFREQ_ADJUST) return 0; mutex_lock(&performance_mutex); diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 76a26609d96b..293f47b814bf 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -2206,10 +2206,6 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list, CPUFREQ_ADJUST, new_policy); - /* adjust if necessary - hardware incompatibility*/ - blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list, - CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE, new_policy); - /* * verify the cpu speed can be set within this limit, which might be * different to the first one diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c index d29e8da396a0..7969f7690498 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c @@ -97,8 +97,8 @@ static int pmi_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, struct cpufreq_frequency_table *cbe_freqs; u8 node; - /* Should this really be called for CPUFREQ_ADJUST, CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE - * and CPUFREQ_NOTIFY policy events?) + /* Should this really be called for CPUFREQ_ADJUST and CPUFREQ_NOTIFY + * policy events?) */ if (event == CPUFREQ_START) return 0; diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/pxafb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/pxafb.c index 7245611ec963..94813af97f09 100644 --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/pxafb.c +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/pxafb.c @@ -1668,7 +1668,6 @@ pxafb_freq_policy(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, void *data) switch (val) { case CPUFREQ_ADJUST: - case CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE: pr_debug("min dma period: %d ps, " "new clock %d kHz\n", pxafb_display_dma_period(var), policy->max); diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/sa1100fb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/sa1100fb.c index 89dd7e02197f..dcf774c15889 100644 --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/sa1100fb.c +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/sa1100fb.c @@ -1042,7 +1042,6 @@ sa1100fb_freq_policy(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, switch (val) { case CPUFREQ_ADJUST: - case CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE: dev_dbg(fbi->dev, "min dma period: %d ps, " "new clock %d kHz\n", sa1100fb_min_dma_period(fbi), policy->max); diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h index bde1e567b3a9..bedcc90c0757 100644 --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h @@ -369,11 +369,10 @@ static inline void cpufreq_resume(void) {} /* Policy Notifiers */ #define CPUFREQ_ADJUST (0) -#define CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE (1) -#define CPUFREQ_NOTIFY (2) -#define CPUFREQ_START (3) -#define CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY (4) -#define CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY (5) +#define CPUFREQ_NOTIFY (1) +#define CPUFREQ_START (2) +#define CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY (3) +#define CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY (4) #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ int cpufreq_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned int list); -- 2.30.2