From 53621860c38caff37fff99ba5f0b817511907bc4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tejun Heo Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:40:57 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] i915: use alloc_ordered_workqueue() instead of explicit UNBOUND w/ max_active = 1 This is an equivalent conversion and will ease scheduled removal of WQ_NON_REENTRANT. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c index 2cba7b4a04ed..2c09900e3267 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c @@ -1558,11 +1558,9 @@ int i915_driver_load(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long flags) * * All tasks on the workqueue are expected to acquire the dev mutex * so there is no point in running more than one instance of the - * workqueue at any time: max_active = 1 and NON_REENTRANT. + * workqueue at any time. Use an ordered one. */ - dev_priv->wq = alloc_workqueue("i915", - WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_NON_REENTRANT, - 1); + dev_priv->wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("i915", 0); if (dev_priv->wq == NULL) { DRM_ERROR("Failed to create our workqueue.\n"); ret = -ENOMEM; -- 2.30.2