From 4609c4f963f353613812f999bb027aac795bcde8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yuyang Du Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 16:19:33 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] locking/lockdep: Remove redundant argument in check_deadlock In check_deadlock(), the third argument read comes from the second argument hlock so that it can be removed. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-18-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index b2ca20aa69aa..be4c1348ddcd 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -2246,7 +2246,7 @@ print_deadlock_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev, * Returns: 0 on deadlock detected, 1 on OK, 2 on recursive read */ static int -check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next, int read) +check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next) { struct held_lock *prev; struct held_lock *nest = NULL; @@ -2265,7 +2265,7 @@ check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next, int read) * Allow read-after-read recursion of the same * lock class (i.e. read_lock(lock)+read_lock(lock)): */ - if ((read == 2) && prev->read) + if ((next->read == 2) && prev->read) return 2; /* @@ -2839,7 +2839,7 @@ static int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr, * The simple case: does the current hold the same lock * already? */ - int ret = check_deadlock(curr, hlock, hlock->read); + int ret = check_deadlock(curr, hlock); if (!ret) return 0; -- 2.30.2