From 26e5378d115501a7cab25fdfc6ab10ccb5e4106f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf8?q?Jos=C3=A9=20Roberto=20de=20Souza?= Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 15:30:44 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: Cache sink synchronization latency MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit This value do not change overtime so better cache it than fetch it every PSR enable. Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180328223046.16125-8-jose.souza@intel.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++------------ 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h index 46cae097201c..5373b171bb96 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h @@ -608,6 +608,7 @@ struct i915_psr { bool alpm; bool has_hw_tracking; bool psr2_enabled; + u8 sink_sync_latency; void (*enable_source)(struct intel_dp *, const struct intel_crtc_state *); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c index bec455e28943..d079cf0b034c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c @@ -122,6 +122,18 @@ static bool intel_dp_get_alpm_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) return alpm_caps & DP_ALPM_CAP; } +static u8 intel_dp_get_sink_sync_latency(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) +{ + u8 val = 0; + + if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, + DP_SYNCHRONIZATION_LATENCY_IN_SINK, &val) == 1) + val &= DP_MAX_RESYNC_FRAME_COUNT_MASK; + else + DRM_ERROR("Unable to get sink synchronization latency\n"); + return val; +} + void intel_psr_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) { struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = @@ -158,6 +170,8 @@ void intel_psr_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) intel_dp_get_colorimetry_status(intel_dp); dev_priv->psr.alpm = intel_dp_get_alpm_status(intel_dp); + dev_priv->psr.sink_sync_latency = + intel_dp_get_sink_sync_latency(intel_dp); } } } @@ -379,10 +393,7 @@ static void hsw_activate_psr2(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) * with the 5 or 6 idle patterns. */ uint32_t idle_frames = max(6, dev_priv->vbt.psr.idle_frames); - uint32_t val; - uint8_t sink_latency; - - val = idle_frames << EDP_PSR2_IDLE_FRAME_SHIFT; + u32 val = idle_frames << EDP_PSR2_IDLE_FRAME_SHIFT; /* FIXME: selective update is probably totally broken because it doesn't * mesh at all with our frontbuffer tracking. And the hw alone isn't @@ -392,14 +403,7 @@ static void hsw_activate_psr2(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) val |= EDP_Y_COORDINATE_VALID | EDP_Y_COORDINATE_ENABLE; } - if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, - DP_SYNCHRONIZATION_LATENCY_IN_SINK, - &sink_latency) == 1) { - sink_latency &= DP_MAX_RESYNC_FRAME_COUNT_MASK; - } else { - sink_latency = 0; - } - val |= EDP_PSR2_FRAME_BEFORE_SU(sink_latency + 1); + val |= EDP_PSR2_FRAME_BEFORE_SU(dev_priv->psr.sink_sync_latency + 1); if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp2_tp3_wakeup_time > 5) val |= EDP_PSR2_TP2_TIME_2500; -- 2.30.2