From 2579b8b0ece53248b815042f8662a4531acf120d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dan Carpenter Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 12:12:56 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/fifo/gk104-: Silence a locking warning Presumably we can never actually hit this return, but static checkers complain that we should unlock before we return. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gk104.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gk104.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gk104.c index 3a24788c3185..a7e55c422501 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gk104.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gk104.c @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ gk104_fifo_runlist_commit(struct gk104_fifo *fifo, int runl) case NVKM_MEM_TARGET_NCOH: target = 3; break; default: WARN_ON(1); - return; + goto unlock; } nvkm_wr32(device, 0x002270, (nvkm_memory_addr(mem) >> 12) | @@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ gk104_fifo_runlist_commit(struct gk104_fifo *fifo, int runl) & 0x00100000), msecs_to_jiffies(2000)) == 0) nvkm_error(subdev, "runlist %d update timeout\n", runl); +unlock: mutex_unlock(&subdev->mutex); } -- 2.30.2