From 1e9a6d8d44cb6dcd2799b36ceb23007e6a423bfe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 16:30:21 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] perf, x86: Remove PEBS SAMPLE_RAW support Its broken, we really should get PERF_SAMPLE_REGS sorted. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra LKML-Reference: Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c | 14 -------------- 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c index ec8b2e12e104..080b9b065bdd 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c @@ -459,7 +459,6 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_core(struct pt_regs *iregs) struct perf_event *event = cpuc->events[0]; /* PMC0 only */ struct pebs_record_core *at, *top; struct perf_sample_data data; - struct perf_raw_record raw; struct pt_regs regs; int n; @@ -499,12 +498,6 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_core(struct pt_regs *iregs) perf_sample_data_init(&data, 0); data.period = event->hw.last_period; - if (event->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_RAW) { - raw.size = x86_pmu.pebs_record_size; - raw.data = at; - data.raw = &raw; - } - /* * We use the interrupt regs as a base because the PEBS record * does not contain a full regs set, specifically it seems to @@ -536,7 +529,6 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(struct pt_regs *iregs) struct pebs_record_nhm *at, *top; struct perf_sample_data data; struct perf_event *event = NULL; - struct perf_raw_record raw; struct pt_regs regs; u64 status = 0; int bit, n; @@ -585,12 +577,6 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(struct pt_regs *iregs) perf_sample_data_init(&data, 0); data.period = event->hw.last_period; - if (event->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_RAW) { - raw.size = x86_pmu.pebs_record_size; - raw.data = at; - data.raw = &raw; - } - /* * See the comment in intel_pmu_drain_pebs_core() */ -- 2.30.2