From 1a01753ed90a4fb84357b9b592e50564c07737f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Will Deacon Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 12:01:12 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: gic: use handle_fasteoi_irq for SPIs Currently, the gic uses handle_level_irq for handling SPIs (Shared Peripheral Interrupts), requiring active interrupts to be masked at the distributor level during IRQ handling. On a virtualised system, only the CPU interfaces are virtualised in hardware. Accesses to the distributor must be trapped by the hypervisor, adding latency to the critical interrupt path in Linux. This patch modifies the GIC code to use handle_fasteoi_irq for handling interrupts, which only requires us to signal EOI to the CPU interface when handling is complete. Cascaded IRQ handling is also updated to use the chained IRQ enter/exit functions to honour the flow control of the parent chip. Note that commit 846afbd1 ("GIC: Dont disable INT in ack callback") broke cascading interrupts by forgetting to add IRQ masking. This is no longer an issue because the unmask call is now unnecessary. Tested on Versatile Express and Realview EB (1176 w/ cascaded GICs). Tested-and-reviewed-by: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar Tested-and-acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar Acked-by: Catalin Marinas Signed-off-by: Will Deacon --- arch/arm/common/gic.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/common/gic.c b/arch/arm/common/gic.c index f70ec7dadebb..e9c2ff83909b 100644 --- a/arch/arm/common/gic.c +++ b/arch/arm/common/gic.c @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ struct gic_chip_data { * Default make them NULL. */ struct irq_chip gic_arch_extn = { - .irq_ack = NULL, + .irq_eoi = NULL, .irq_mask = NULL, .irq_unmask = NULL, .irq_retrigger = NULL, @@ -84,15 +84,6 @@ static inline unsigned int gic_irq(struct irq_data *d) /* * Routines to acknowledge, disable and enable interrupts */ -static void gic_ack_irq(struct irq_data *d) -{ - spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock); - if (gic_arch_extn.irq_ack) - gic_arch_extn.irq_ack(d); - writel(gic_irq(d), gic_cpu_base(d) + GIC_CPU_EOI); - spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock); -} - static void gic_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d) { u32 mask = 1 << (d->irq % 32); @@ -115,6 +106,17 @@ static void gic_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d) spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock); } +static void gic_eoi_irq(struct irq_data *d) +{ + if (gic_arch_extn.irq_eoi) { + spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock); + gic_arch_extn.irq_eoi(d); + spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock); + } + + writel(gic_irq(d), gic_cpu_base(d) + GIC_CPU_EOI); +} + static int gic_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type) { void __iomem *base = gic_dist_base(d); @@ -218,8 +220,7 @@ static void gic_handle_cascade_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc) unsigned int cascade_irq, gic_irq; unsigned long status; - /* primary controller ack'ing */ - chip->irq_ack(&desc->irq_data); + chained_irq_enter(chip, desc); spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock); status = readl(chip_data->cpu_base + GIC_CPU_INTACK); @@ -236,15 +237,14 @@ static void gic_handle_cascade_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc) generic_handle_irq(cascade_irq); out: - /* primary controller unmasking */ - chip->irq_unmask(&desc->irq_data); + chained_irq_exit(chip, desc); } static struct irq_chip gic_chip = { .name = "GIC", - .irq_ack = gic_ack_irq, .irq_mask = gic_mask_irq, .irq_unmask = gic_unmask_irq, + .irq_eoi = gic_eoi_irq, .irq_set_type = gic_set_type, .irq_retrigger = gic_retrigger, #ifdef CONFIG_SMP @@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic, * Setup the Linux IRQ subsystem. */ for (i = irq_start; i < irq_limit; i++) { - irq_set_chip_and_handler(i, &gic_chip, handle_level_irq); + irq_set_chip_and_handler(i, &gic_chip, handle_fasteoi_irq); irq_set_chip_data(i, gic); set_irq_flags(i, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE); } -- 2.30.2