From 14e087576081f4f3a6fc6a229166b05b65cf98e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Leonard Crestez Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 17:17:10 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] PM / QoS: Initial kunit test The pm_qos family of APIs are used in relatively difficult to reproduce scenarios such as thermal throttling so they benefit from unit testing. Start by adding basic tests from the the freq_qos APIs. It includes tests for issues that were brought up on mailing lists: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11252425/#23017005 https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11253421/ Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/base/Kconfig | 4 ++ drivers/base/power/Makefile | 1 + drivers/base/power/qos-test.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 122 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/base/power/qos-test.c diff --git a/drivers/base/Kconfig b/drivers/base/Kconfig index 28b92e3cc570..c3b3b5c0b0da 100644 --- a/drivers/base/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/base/Kconfig @@ -148,6 +148,10 @@ config DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE unusable. You should say N here unless you are explicitly looking to test this functionality. +config PM_QOS_KUNIT_TEST + bool "KUnit Test for PM QoS features" + depends on KUNIT + config HMEM_REPORTING bool default n diff --git a/drivers/base/power/Makefile b/drivers/base/power/Makefile index ec5bb190b9d0..8fdd0073eeeb 100644 --- a/drivers/base/power/Makefile +++ b/drivers/base/power/Makefile @@ -4,5 +4,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) += main.o wakeup.o wakeup_stats.o obj-$(CONFIG_PM_TRACE_RTC) += trace.o obj-$(CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS) += domain.o domain_governor.o obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK) += clock_ops.o +obj-$(CONFIG_PM_QOS_KUNIT_TEST) += qos-test.o ccflags-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_DRIVER) := -DDEBUG diff --git a/drivers/base/power/qos-test.c b/drivers/base/power/qos-test.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..3115db08d56b --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/base/power/qos-test.c @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Copyright 2019 NXP + */ +#include +#include + +/* Basic test for aggregating two "min" requests */ +static void freq_qos_test_min(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct freq_constraints qos; + struct freq_qos_request req1, req2; + int ret; + + freq_constraints_init(&qos); + memset(&req1, 0, sizeof(req1)); + memset(&req2, 0, sizeof(req2)); + + ret = freq_qos_add_request(&qos, &req1, FREQ_QOS_MIN, 1000); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 1); + ret = freq_qos_add_request(&qos, &req2, FREQ_QOS_MIN, 2000); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 1); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, freq_qos_read_value(&qos, FREQ_QOS_MIN), 2000); + + ret = freq_qos_remove_request(&req2); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, freq_qos_read_value(&qos, FREQ_QOS_MIN), 1000); + + ret = freq_qos_remove_request(&req1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, freq_qos_read_value(&qos, FREQ_QOS_MIN), + FREQ_QOS_MIN_DEFAULT_VALUE); +} + +/* Test that requests for MAX_DEFAULT_VALUE have no effect */ +static void freq_qos_test_maxdef(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct freq_constraints qos; + struct freq_qos_request req1, req2; + int ret; + + freq_constraints_init(&qos); + memset(&req1, 0, sizeof(req1)); + memset(&req2, 0, sizeof(req2)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, freq_qos_read_value(&qos, FREQ_QOS_MAX), + FREQ_QOS_MAX_DEFAULT_VALUE); + + ret = freq_qos_add_request(&qos, &req1, FREQ_QOS_MAX, + FREQ_QOS_MAX_DEFAULT_VALUE); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + ret = freq_qos_add_request(&qos, &req2, FREQ_QOS_MAX, + FREQ_QOS_MAX_DEFAULT_VALUE); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + + /* Add max 1000 */ + ret = freq_qos_update_request(&req1, 1000); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, freq_qos_read_value(&qos, FREQ_QOS_MAX), 1000); + + /* Add max 2000, no impact */ + ret = freq_qos_update_request(&req2, 2000); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, freq_qos_read_value(&qos, FREQ_QOS_MAX), 1000); + + /* Remove max 1000, new max 2000 */ + ret = freq_qos_remove_request(&req1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, freq_qos_read_value(&qos, FREQ_QOS_MAX), 2000); +} + +/* + * Test that a freq_qos_request can be added again after removal + * + * This issue was solved by commit 05ff1ba412fd ("PM: QoS: Invalidate frequency + * QoS requests after removal") + */ +static void freq_qos_test_readd(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct freq_constraints qos; + struct freq_qos_request req; + int ret; + + freq_constraints_init(&qos); + memset(&req, 0, sizeof(req)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, freq_qos_read_value(&qos, FREQ_QOS_MIN), + FREQ_QOS_MIN_DEFAULT_VALUE); + + /* Add */ + ret = freq_qos_add_request(&qos, &req, FREQ_QOS_MIN, 1000); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, freq_qos_read_value(&qos, FREQ_QOS_MIN), 1000); + + /* Remove */ + ret = freq_qos_remove_request(&req); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, freq_qos_read_value(&qos, FREQ_QOS_MIN), + FREQ_QOS_MIN_DEFAULT_VALUE); + + /* Add again */ + ret = freq_qos_add_request(&qos, &req, FREQ_QOS_MIN, 2000); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, freq_qos_read_value(&qos, FREQ_QOS_MIN), 2000); +} + +static struct kunit_case pm_qos_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(freq_qos_test_min), + KUNIT_CASE(freq_qos_test_maxdef), + KUNIT_CASE(freq_qos_test_readd), + {}, +}; + +static struct kunit_suite pm_qos_test_module = { + .name = "qos-kunit-test", + .test_cases = pm_qos_test_cases, +}; +kunit_test_suite(pm_qos_test_module); -- 2.30.2