From 0fb4eb6f630a22bf4c2f358ef2db91f28a3d18d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vinicius Costa Gomes Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 20:02:27 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] Bluetooth: Fix sending wrong authentication requirements Until we support any pairing method (Passkey Entry, OOB) that gives MITM protection we shouldn't send that we have MITM protection. Signed-off-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes Signed-off-by: Gustavo F. Padovan --- net/bluetooth/smp.c | 19 ++----------------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/bluetooth/smp.c b/net/bluetooth/smp.c index 03489e5815ef..7e558465133f 100644 --- a/net/bluetooth/smp.c +++ b/net/bluetooth/smp.c @@ -187,18 +187,6 @@ static void smp_send_cmd(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 code, u16 len, void *data) msecs_to_jiffies(SMP_TIMEOUT)); } -static __u8 seclevel_to_authreq(__u8 level) -{ - switch (level) { - case BT_SECURITY_HIGH: - /* Right now we don't support bonding */ - return SMP_AUTH_MITM; - - default: - return SMP_AUTH_NONE; - } -} - static void build_pairing_cmd(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct smp_cmd_pairing *req, struct smp_cmd_pairing *rsp, @@ -542,7 +530,6 @@ int smp_conn_security(struct l2cap_conn *conn, __u8 sec_level) { struct hci_conn *hcon = conn->hcon; struct smp_chan *smp = conn->smp_chan; - __u8 authreq; BT_DBG("conn %p hcon %p level 0x%2.2x", conn, hcon, sec_level); @@ -580,19 +567,17 @@ int smp_conn_security(struct l2cap_conn *conn, __u8 sec_level) smp = smp_chan_create(conn); - authreq = seclevel_to_authreq(sec_level); - if (hcon->link_mode & HCI_LM_MASTER) { struct smp_cmd_pairing cp; - build_pairing_cmd(conn, &cp, NULL, authreq); + build_pairing_cmd(conn, &cp, NULL, SMP_AUTH_NONE); smp->preq[0] = SMP_CMD_PAIRING_REQ; memcpy(&smp->preq[1], &cp, sizeof(cp)); smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_REQ, sizeof(cp), &cp); } else { struct smp_cmd_security_req cp; - cp.auth_req = authreq; + cp.auth_req = SMP_AUTH_NONE; smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_SECURITY_REQ, sizeof(cp), &cp); } -- 2.30.2