From 0f4d3aa761b71cd6984330baca1e18bf0590e441 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthew Whitehead Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 16:46:01 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] x86/cpu/cyrix: Remove {get,set}Cx86_old macros used for Cyrix processors The getCx86_old() and setCx86_old() macros have been replaced with correctly working getCx86() and setCx86(), so remove these unused macros. Signed-off-by: Matthew Whitehead Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: luto@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1552596361-8967-3-git-send-email-tedheadster@gmail.com --- arch/x86/include/asm/processor-cyrix.h | 21 --------------------- 1 file changed, 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor-cyrix.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor-cyrix.h index aaedd73ea2c6..df700a6cc869 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor-cyrix.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor-cyrix.h @@ -3,19 +3,6 @@ * NSC/Cyrix CPU indexed register access. Must be inlined instead of * macros to ensure correct access ordering * Access order is always 0x22 (=offset), 0x23 (=value) - * - * When using the old macros a line like - * setCx86(CX86_CCR2, getCx86(CX86_CCR2) | 0x88); - * gets expanded to: - * do { - * outb((CX86_CCR2), 0x22); - * outb((({ - * outb((CX86_CCR2), 0x22); - * inb(0x23); - * }) | 0x88), 0x23); - * } while (0); - * - * which in fact violates the access order (= 0x22, 0x22, 0x23, 0x23). */ static inline u8 getCx86(u8 reg) @@ -29,11 +16,3 @@ static inline void setCx86(u8 reg, u8 data) outb(reg, 0x22); outb(data, 0x23); } - -#define getCx86_old(reg) ({ outb((reg), 0x22); inb(0x23); }) - -#define setCx86_old(reg, data) do { \ - outb((reg), 0x22); \ - outb((data), 0x23); \ -} while (0) - -- 2.30.2