From 09a6262b3ced1bad3554e157495f80d81e68d2e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Imre Kaloz Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 12:45:50 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] fix VFP handling on feroceon cores SVN-Revision: 16246 --- .../990-fix_feroceon_vfp_handling.patch | 70 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+) create mode 100644 target/linux/generic-2.6/patches-2.6.30/990-fix_feroceon_vfp_handling.patch diff --git a/target/linux/generic-2.6/patches-2.6.30/990-fix_feroceon_vfp_handling.patch b/target/linux/generic-2.6/patches-2.6.30/990-fix_feroceon_vfp_handling.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..0ee18f02b1 --- /dev/null +++ b/target/linux/generic-2.6/patches-2.6.30/990-fix_feroceon_vfp_handling.patch @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ +From: Catalin Marinas +Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 13:00:18 +0000 (+0100) +Subject: Fix the VFP handling on the Feroceon CPU +X-Git-Url: http://www.linux-arm.org/git?p=linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=85d6943af50537d3aec58b967ffbd3fec88453e9;hp=26584853a44c58f3d6ac7360d697a2ddcd1a3efa + +Fix the VFP handling on the Feroceon CPU + +This CPU generates synchronous VFP exceptions in a non-standard way - +the FPEXC.EX bit set but without the FPSCR.IXE bit being set like in the +VFP subarchitecture 1 or just the FPEXC.DEX bit like in VFP +subarchitecture 2. The main problem is that the faulty instruction +(which needs to be emulated in software) will be restarted several times +(normally until a context switch disables the VFP). This patch ensures +that the VFP exception is treated as synchronous. + +Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas +Cc: Nicolas Pitre +--- + +--- a/arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S ++++ b/arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S +@@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ ENTRY(vfp_support_entry) + beq no_old_VFP_process + VFPFSTMIA r4, r5 @ save the working registers + VFPFMRX r5, FPSCR @ current status ++#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_FEROCEON + tst r1, #FPEXC_EX @ is there additional state to save? + beq 1f + VFPFMRX r6, FPINST @ FPINST (only if FPEXC.EX is set) +@@ -107,6 +108,7 @@ ENTRY(vfp_support_entry) + beq 1f + VFPFMRX r8, FPINST2 @ FPINST2 if needed (and present) + 1: ++#endif + stmia r4, {r1, r5, r6, r8} @ save FPEXC, FPSCR, FPINST, FPINST2 + @ and point r4 at the word at the + @ start of the register dump +@@ -119,6 +121,7 @@ no_old_VFP_process: + VFPFLDMIA r10, r5 @ reload the working registers while + @ FPEXC is in a safe state + ldmia r10, {r1, r5, r6, r8} @ load FPEXC, FPSCR, FPINST, FPINST2 ++#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_FEROCEON + tst r1, #FPEXC_EX @ is there additional state to restore? + beq 1f + VFPFMXR FPINST, r6 @ restore FPINST (only if FPEXC.EX is set) +@@ -126,6 +129,7 @@ no_old_VFP_process: + beq 1f + VFPFMXR FPINST2, r8 @ FPINST2 if needed (and present) + 1: ++#endif + VFPFMXR FPSCR, r5 @ restore status + + check_for_exception: +--- a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c ++++ b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c +@@ -253,12 +253,14 @@ void VFP_bounce(u32 trigger, u32 fpexc, + } + + if (fpexc & FPEXC_EX) { ++#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_FEROCEON + /* + * Asynchronous exception. The instruction is read from FPINST + * and the interrupted instruction has to be restarted. + */ + trigger = fmrx(FPINST); + regs->ARM_pc -= 4; ++#endif + } else if (!(fpexc & FPEXC_DEX)) { + /* + * Illegal combination of bits. It can be caused by an -- 2.30.2