openwrt/staging/blogic.git
5 years agoASoC: Fail card instantiation if DAI format setup fails
Ricard Wanderlof [Wed, 24 Jul 2019 09:38:44 +0000 (11:38 +0200)]
ASoC: Fail card instantiation if DAI format setup fails

If the DAI format setup fails, there is no valid communication format
between CPU and CODEC, so fail card instantiation, rather than continue
with a card that will most likely not function properly.

Signed-off-by: Ricard Wanderlof <ricardw@axis.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.20.1907241132350.6338@lnxricardw1.se.axis.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: SOF: Intel: hda: remove misleading error trace from IRQ thread
Kai Vehmanen [Mon, 22 Jul 2019 14:14:01 +0000 (09:14 -0500)]
ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda: remove misleading error trace from IRQ thread

Downgrade "nothing to do in IRQ thread" message from error to a debug
message in the IPC interrupt handler thread.

The spurious wake-up can happen if a HDA stream interrupt is
raised while the IPC interrupt thread is running. IPC functionality
is not impacted by this condition, so debug is a more appropriate
trace level.

Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190722141402.7194-21-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: qcom: apq8016_sbc: Fix oops with multiple DAI links
Stephan Gerhold [Mon, 22 Jul 2019 13:03:52 +0000 (15:03 +0200)]
ASoC: qcom: apq8016_sbc: Fix oops with multiple DAI links

apq8016_sbc_parse_of() sets up multiple DAI links, depending on the
number of nodes in the device tree. However, at the moment
CPU and platform components are only allocated for the first link.
This causes an oops when more than one link is defined:

Internal error: Oops: 96000044 [#1] SMP
CPU: 0 PID: 1015 Comm: kworker/0:2 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc1 #4
Call trace:
 apq8016_sbc_platform_probe+0x1a8/0x3f0
 platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xa0
...

Move the allocation inside the loop to ensure that each link is
properly initialized.

Fixes: 98b232ca9e0e ("ASoC: qcom: apq8016_sbc: use modern dai_link style")
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Acked-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190722130352.95874-1-stephan@gerhold.net
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: dapm: fix a memory leak bug
Wenwen Wang [Mon, 22 Jul 2019 13:57:44 +0000 (08:57 -0500)]
ASoC: dapm: fix a memory leak bug

In snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked(), a kernel buffer is allocated in
dapm_cnew_widget() to hold the new dapm widget. Then, different actions are
taken according to the id of the widget, i.e., 'w->id'. If any failure
occurs during this process, snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked() should be
terminated by going to the 'request_failed' label. However, the allocated
kernel buffer is not freed on this code path, leading to a memory leak bug.

To fix the above issue, free the buffer before returning from
snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked() through the 'request_failed' label.

Signed-off-by: Wenwen Wang <wenwen@cs.uga.edu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1563803864-2809-1-git-send-email-wang6495@umn.edu
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: SOF: use __u32 instead of uint32_t in uapi headers
Masahiro Yamada [Sun, 21 Jul 2019 14:23:08 +0000 (23:23 +0900)]
ASoC: SOF: use __u32 instead of uint32_t in uapi headers

When CONFIG_UAPI_HEADER_TEST=y, exported headers are compile-tested to
make sure they can be included from user-space.

Currently, header.h and fw.h are excluded from the test coverage.
To make them join the compile-test, we need to fix the build errors
attached below.

For a case like this, we decided to use __u{8,16,32,64} variable types
in this discussion:

  https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/6/5/18

Build log:

  CC      usr/include/sound/sof/header.h.s
  CC      usr/include/sound/sof/fw.h.s
In file included from <command-line>:32:0:
./usr/include/sound/sof/header.h:19:2: error: unknown type name ‘uint32_t’
  uint32_t magic;  /**< 'S', 'O', 'F', '\0' */
  ^~~~~~~~
./usr/include/sound/sof/header.h:20:2: error: unknown type name ‘uint32_t’
  uint32_t type;  /**< component specific type */
  ^~~~~~~~
./usr/include/sound/sof/header.h:21:2: error: unknown type name ‘uint32_t’
  uint32_t size;  /**< size in bytes of data excl. this struct */
  ^~~~~~~~
./usr/include/sound/sof/header.h:22:2: error: unknown type name ‘uint32_t’
  uint32_t abi;  /**< SOF ABI version */
  ^~~~~~~~
./usr/include/sound/sof/header.h:23:2: error: unknown type name ‘uint32_t’
  uint32_t reserved[4]; /**< reserved for future use */
  ^~~~~~~~
./usr/include/sound/sof/header.h:24:2: error: unknown type name ‘uint32_t’
  uint32_t data[0]; /**< Component data - opaque to core */
  ^~~~~~~~
In file included from <command-line>:32:0:
./usr/include/sound/sof/fw.h:49:2: error: unknown type name ‘uint32_t’
  uint32_t size;  /* bytes minus this header */
  ^~~~~~~~
./usr/include/sound/sof/fw.h:50:2: error: unknown type name ‘uint32_t’
  uint32_t offset; /* offset from base */
  ^~~~~~~~
./usr/include/sound/sof/fw.h:64:2: error: unknown type name ‘uint32_t’
  uint32_t size;  /* bytes minus this header */
  ^~~~~~~~
./usr/include/sound/sof/fw.h:65:2: error: unknown type name ‘uint32_t’
  uint32_t num_blocks; /* number of blocks */
  ^~~~~~~~
./usr/include/sound/sof/fw.h:73:2: error: unknown type name ‘uint32_t’
  uint32_t file_size; /* size of file minus this header */
  ^~~~~~~~
./usr/include/sound/sof/fw.h:74:2: error: unknown type name ‘uint32_t’
  uint32_t num_modules; /* number of modules */
  ^~~~~~~~
./usr/include/sound/sof/fw.h:75:2: error: unknown type name ‘uint32_t’
  uint32_t abi;  /* version of header format */
  ^~~~~~~~

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190721142308.30306-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoSoC: rockchip: rockchip_max98090: Enable MICBIAS for headset keypress detection
Enric Balletbo i Serra [Fri, 19 Jul 2019 17:39:29 +0000 (19:39 +0200)]
SoC: rockchip: rockchip_max98090: Enable MICBIAS for headset keypress detection

The TS3A227E says that the headset keypress detection needs the MICBIAS
power in order to report the key events to ensure proper operation
The headset keypress detection needs the MICBIAS power in order to report
the key events all the time as long as MIC is present. So MICBIAS pin
is forced on when a MICROPHONE is detected.

On Veyron Minnie I observed that if the MICBIAS power is not present and
the key press detection is activated (just because it is enabled when you
insert a headset), it randomly reports a keypress on insert.
E.g. (KEY_PLAYPAUSE)

 Event: (SW_HEADPHONE_INSERT), value 1
 Event: (SW_MICROPHONE_INSERT), value 1
 Event: -------------- SYN_REPORT ------------
 Event: (KEY_PLAYPAUSE), value 1

Userspace thinks that KEY_PLAYPAUSE is pressed and produces the annoying
effect that the media player starts a play/pause loop.

Note that, although most of the time the key reported is the one
associated with BTN_0, not always this is true. On my tests I also saw
different keys reported

Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190719173929.24065-1-enric.balletbo@collabora.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: cs42xx8: Fix MFREQ selection issue for async mode
Shengjiu Wang [Tue, 16 Jul 2019 09:45:47 +0000 (17:45 +0800)]
ASoC: cs42xx8: Fix MFREQ selection issue for async mode

When sample rate of TX is different with sample rate of RX in
async mode, the MFreq selection will be wrong.

For example, sysclk = 24.576MHz, TX rate = 96000Hz, RX rate = 48000Hz.
Then ratio of TX = 256, ratio of RX = 512, For MFreq is shared by TX
and RX instance, the correct value of MFreq is 2 for both TX and RX.

But original method will cause MFreq = 0 for TX, MFreq = 2 for RX.
If TX is started after RX, RX will be impacted, RX work abnormal with
MFreq = 0.

This patch is to select proper MFreq value according to TX rate and
RX rate.

Fixes: 0c516b4ff85c ("ASoC: cs42xx8: Add codec driver support for CS42448/CS42888")
Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190716094547.46787-1-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: dapm: Fix handling of custom_stop_condition on DAPM graph walks
Charles Keepax [Thu, 18 Jul 2019 08:43:33 +0000 (09:43 +0100)]
ASoC: dapm: Fix handling of custom_stop_condition on DAPM graph walks

DPCM uses snd_soc_dapm_dai_get_connected_widgets to build a
list of the widgets connected to a specific front end DAI so it
can search through this list for available back end DAIs. The
custom_stop_condition was added to is_connected_ep to facilitate this
list not containing more widgets than is necessary. Doing so both
speeds up the DPCM handling as less widgets need to be searched and
avoids issues with CODEC to CODEC links as these would be confused
with back end DAIs if they appeared in the list of available widgets.

custom_stop_condition was implemented by aborting the graph walk
when the condition is triggered, however there is an issue with this
approach. Whilst walking the graph is_connected_ep should update the
endpoints cache on each widget, if the walk is aborted the number
of attached end points is unknown for that sub-graph. When the stop
condition triggered, the original patch ignored the triggering widget
and returned zero connected end points; a later patch updated this
to set the triggering widget's cache to 1 and return that. Both of
these approaches result in inaccurate values being stored in various
end point caches as the values propagate back through the graph,
which can result in later issues with widgets powering/not powering
unexpectedly.

As the original goal was to reduce the size of the widget list passed
to the DPCM code, the simplest solution is to limit the functionality
of the custom_stop_condition to the widget list. This means the rest
of the graph will still be processed resulting in correct end point
caches, but only widgets up to the stop condition will be added to the
returned widget list.

Fixes: 6742064aef7f ("ASoC: dapm: support user-defined stop condition in dai_get_connected_widgets")
Fixes: 5fdd022c2026 ("ASoC: dpcm: play nice with CODEC<->CODEC links")
Fixes: 09464974eaa8 ("ASoC: dapm: Fix to return correct path list in is_connected_ep.")
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190718084333.15598-1-ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: Intel: bytcht_es8316: Add quirk for Irbis NB41 netbook
Hans de Goede [Fri, 12 Jul 2019 11:27:08 +0000 (13:27 +0200)]
ASoC: Intel: bytcht_es8316: Add quirk for Irbis NB41 netbook

The Irbis NB41 netbook has its internal mic on IN2, inverted jack-detect
and stereo speakers, add a quirk for this.

Cc: russianneuromancer@ya.ru
Reported-and-tested-by: russianneuromancer@ya.ru
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190712112708.25327-1-hdegoede@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: samsung: odroid: fix a double-free issue for cpu_dai
Wen Yang [Sat, 13 Jul 2019 03:46:15 +0000 (11:46 +0800)]
ASoC: samsung: odroid: fix a double-free issue for cpu_dai

The cpu_dai variable is still being used after the of_node_put() call,
which may result in double-free:

        of_node_put(cpu_dai);            ---> released here

        ret = devm_snd_soc_register_card(dev, card);
        if (ret < 0) {
...
                goto err_put_clk_i2s;    --> jump to err_put_clk_i2s
...

err_put_clk_i2s:
        clk_put(priv->clk_i2s_bus);
err_put_sclk:
        clk_put(priv->sclk_i2s);
err_put_cpu_dai:
        of_node_put(cpu_dai);            --> double-free here

Fixes: d832d2b246c5 ("ASoC: samsung: odroid: Fix of_node refcount unbalance")
Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@samsung.com>
Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1562989575-33785-3-git-send-email-wen.yang99@zte.com.cn
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: samsung: odroid: fix an use-after-free issue for codec
Wen Yang [Sat, 13 Jul 2019 03:46:14 +0000 (11:46 +0800)]
ASoC: samsung: odroid: fix an use-after-free issue for codec

The codec variable is still being used after the of_node_put() call,
which may result in use-after-free.

Fixes: bc3cf17b575a ("ASoC: samsung: odroid: Add support for secondary CPU DAI")
Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@samsung.com>
Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1562989575-33785-2-git-send-email-wen.yang99@zte.com.cn
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: audio-graph-card: add missing const at graph_get_dai_id()
Kuninori Morimoto [Thu, 11 Jul 2019 04:10:45 +0000 (13:10 +0900)]
ASoC: audio-graph-card: add missing const at graph_get_dai_id()

commit c152f8491a8d9 ("ASoC: audio-graph-card: fix an use-after-free in
graph_get_dai_id()") fixups use-after-free issue,
but, it need to use "const" for reg. This patch adds it.

We will have below without this patch

LINUX/sound/soc/generic/audio-graph-card.c: In function 'graph_get_dai_id':
LINUX/sound/soc/generic/audio-graph-card.c:87:7: warning: assignment discards\
 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
   reg = of_get_property(node, "reg", NULL);

Fixes: c152f8491a8d9 ("ASoC: audio-graph-card: fix an use-after-free in graph_get_dai_id()")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Acked-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87sgrd43ja.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: rt1011: fix DC calibration offset not applying
Shuming Fan [Thu, 11 Jul 2019 08:22:14 +0000 (16:22 +0800)]
ASoC: rt1011: fix DC calibration offset not applying

There are two issues to fix:
- DC offset calibration data will be reset after stopping playback.
- DC offset calibration data should be applied in the initial setting.

Signed-off-by: Shuming Fan <shumingf@realtek.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190711082214.8142-1-shumingf@realtek.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: audio-graph-card: fix an use-after-free in graph_get_dai_id()
Wen Yang [Wed, 10 Jul 2019 07:25:09 +0000 (15:25 +0800)]
ASoC: audio-graph-card: fix an use-after-free in graph_get_dai_id()

After calling of_node_put() on the node variable, it is still being
used, which may result in use-after-free.
Fix this issue by calling of_node_put() after the last usage.

Fixes: a0c426fe1433 ("ASoC: simple-card-utils: check "reg" property on asoc_simple_card_get_dai_id()")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1562743509-30496-5-git-send-email-wen.yang99@zte.com.cn
Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>
Acked-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: audio-graph-card: fix use-after-free in graph_dai_link_of_dpcm()
Wen Yang [Wed, 10 Jul 2019 07:25:08 +0000 (15:25 +0800)]
ASoC: audio-graph-card: fix use-after-free in graph_dai_link_of_dpcm()

After calling of_node_put() on the ports, port, and node variables,
they are still being used, which may result in use-after-free.
Fix this issue by calling of_node_put() after the last usage.

Fixes: dd98fbc558a0 ("ASoC: audio-graph-card: cleanup DAI link loop method - step1")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1562743509-30496-4-git-send-email-wen.yang99@zte.com.cn
Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>
Acked-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: simple-card: fix an use-after-free in simple_for_each_link()
Wen Yang [Wed, 10 Jul 2019 07:25:07 +0000 (15:25 +0800)]
ASoC: simple-card: fix an use-after-free in simple_for_each_link()

The codec variable is still being used after the of_node_put() call,
which may result in use-after-free.

Fixes: d947cdfd4be2 ("ASoC: simple-card: cleanup DAI link loop method - step1")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1562743509-30496-3-git-send-email-wen.yang99@zte.com.cn
Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>
Acked-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: simple-card: fix an use-after-free in simple_dai_link_of_dpcm()
Wen Yang [Wed, 10 Jul 2019 07:25:06 +0000 (15:25 +0800)]
ASoC: simple-card: fix an use-after-free in simple_dai_link_of_dpcm()

The node variable is still being used after the of_node_put() call,
which may result in use-after-free.

Fixes: cfc652a73331 ("ASoC: simple-card: tidyup prefix for snd_soc_codec_conf")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1562743509-30496-2-git-send-email-wen.yang99@zte.com.cn
Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>
Acked-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: simple-card-utils: care no Platform for DPCM
Kuninori Morimoto [Wed, 10 Jul 2019 08:01:12 +0000 (17:01 +0900)]
ASoC: simple-card-utils: care no Platform for DPCM

commit 34614739988ad ("ASoC: soc-core: support dai_link with
platforms_num != 1") supports multi Platform, and
commit 9f3eb91753451 ("ASoC: simple-card-utils: consider CPU-Platform
possibility") removed no Platform from simple-card.

Multi Platform is now checking both Platform name/of_node are NULL case.
But in normal case, DPCM be doesn't have Platform.

asoc_simple_canonicalize_platform() try to use CPU of_node
to Platform (This is needed for DMAEngine platform case),
but it still might be NULL at DPCM be.

This patch try to use no Platform after that if Platform of_node
is still NULL. It can't probe without this patch.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87muhmgw2o.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: simple_card_utils.h: care NULL dai at asoc_simple_debug_dai()
Kuninori Morimoto [Wed, 10 Jul 2019 07:59:55 +0000 (16:59 +0900)]
ASoC: simple_card_utils.h: care NULL dai at asoc_simple_debug_dai()

props->xxx_dai might be NULL when DPCM.
This patch cares it for debug.

Fixes: commit 0580dde59438 ("ASoC: simple-card-utils: add asoc_simple_debug_info()")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87o922gw4u.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: Relocate my e-mail to .com domain zone
Kirill Marinushkin [Wed, 10 Jul 2019 05:51:35 +0000 (07:51 +0200)]
ASoC: Relocate my e-mail to .com domain zone

Signed-off-by: Kirill Marinushkin <kmarinushkin@birdec.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190710055135.21377-1-kmarinushkin@birdec.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: rt1308: Remove executable attribute from source files
Joe Perches [Tue, 9 Jul 2019 17:22:16 +0000 (10:22 -0700)]
ASoC: rt1308: Remove executable attribute from source files

These are source files not executable.

Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d198a3e6ed3a0e9070afeb6aca69903c3e985149.camel@perches.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: max98357a: use mdelay for sdmode-delay
Tzung-Bi Shih [Mon, 8 Jul 2019 14:19:01 +0000 (22:19 +0800)]
ASoC: max98357a: use mdelay for sdmode-delay

max98357a_daiops_trigger() is possible to be called in atomic context if
the .nonatomic flag is equal to 0 in the DAI links.

When cancel_delayed_work_sync() in max98357a_daiops_trigger() is called
in atomic context, kernel emits the following message: "BUG: sleeping
function called from invalid context".

According to the DT binding document, value less than or equal to 5ms of
sdmod-delay should be sufficient to avoid the pop noise.  Use mdelay
(i.e. busy loop) for such low delay should be acceptable.

Fixes: cec5b01f8f1c ("ASoC: max98357a: avoid speaker pop when playback
startup")

Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190708141901.68797-1-tzungbi@google.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: SOF: Intel: implement runtime idle for CNL/APL
Kai Vehmanen [Tue, 2 Jul 2019 13:24:28 +0000 (16:24 +0300)]
ASoC: SOF: Intel: implement runtime idle for CNL/APL

Implement runtime idle for CNL/APL devices using similar runtime
PM idle logic as the Intel AZX HDA driver. If any HDA codecs are
powered when runtime suspend request comes, return -EBUSY. By doing
this, strict ordering is enforced between HDA codec and the HDA
controller.

Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190702132428.13129-4-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: SOF: add runtime idle callback
Kai Vehmanen [Tue, 2 Jul 2019 13:24:27 +0000 (16:24 +0300)]
ASoC: SOF: add runtime idle callback

Add ability to implement a SOF device level runtime idle callback.

Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190702132428.13129-3-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: hdac_hdmi: report codec link up/down status to bus
Kai Vehmanen [Tue, 2 Jul 2019 13:24:26 +0000 (16:24 +0300)]
ASoC: hdac_hdmi: report codec link up/down status to bus

Report codec power status to the HDA codec bus from runtime pm
suspend and resume callbacks. This is required to implement
runtime idle logic that relies on 'codec_powered' field of hdac_bus
to be maintained for all codecs.

Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190702132428.13129-2-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: SOF: debug: fix possible memory leak in sof_dfsentry_write()
Wei Yongjun [Fri, 5 Jul 2019 08:16:37 +0000 (08:16 +0000)]
ASoC: SOF: debug: fix possible memory leak in sof_dfsentry_write()

'string' is malloced in sof_dfsentry_write() and should be freed
before leaving from the error handling cases, otherwise it will cause
memory leak.

Fixes: 091c12e1f50c ("ASoC: SOF: debug: add new debugfs entries for IPC flood test")
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190705081637.157169-1-weiyongjun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: sunxi: sun50i-codec-analog: Add earpiece
Luca Weiss [Wed, 3 Jul 2019 18:48:11 +0000 (20:48 +0200)]
ASoC: sunxi: sun50i-codec-analog: Add earpiece

This adds the necessary registers and audio routes to play audio using
the Earpiece, that's supported on the A64.

Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190703184814.27191-1-luca@z3ntu.xyz
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: rt5665: remove redundant assignment to variable idx
Colin Ian King [Fri, 5 Jul 2019 07:53:03 +0000 (08:53 +0100)]
ASoC: rt5665: remove redundant assignment to variable idx

The variable idx is being initialized with a value that is never
read and it is being updated later with a new value. The
initialization is redundant and can be removed.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190705075303.14692-1-colin.king@canonical.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: wcd9335: remove multiple defines.
Srinivas Kandagatla [Thu, 4 Jul 2019 16:54:10 +0000 (17:54 +0100)]
ASoC: wcd9335: remove multiple defines.

Found during review that there are multiple defines of same constants.
This patch removes them!

Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190704165410.7173-1-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: qdsp6: q6afe-dai: Add missing Slimbus0 audio route
Srinivas Kandagatla [Wed, 3 Jul 2019 12:31:02 +0000 (13:31 +0100)]
ASoC: qdsp6: q6afe-dai: Add missing Slimbus0 audio route

For some reason SLIMBus RX0 playback is not added to audio routes.
This patch adds the missing route.

Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190703123102.12626-1-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: core: Return -ENOTSUPP from set_channel_map() if no operation provided
Srinivas Kandagatla [Wed, 3 Jul 2019 12:30:02 +0000 (13:30 +0100)]
ASoC: core: Return -ENOTSUPP from set_channel_map() if no operation provided

It makes it easier for common code to work with snd_soc_dai_set_channel_map()
by distinguishing between operation not being supported and an error.
This is done inline with others snd_soc_dai.* apis.

Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190703123002.12427-1-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: meson: axg-tdm-formatter: add reset
Jerome Brunet [Wed, 3 Jul 2019 12:07:49 +0000 (14:07 +0200)]
ASoC: meson: axg-tdm-formatter: add reset

Add the optional reset line handling which is present on the new SoC
families, such as the g12a. Triggering this reset is not critical but
it helps solve a channel shift issue on the g12a.

Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190703120749.32341-3-jbrunet@baylibre.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: meson: axg-tdm-formatter: add reset to the bindings documentation
Jerome Brunet [Wed, 3 Jul 2019 12:07:48 +0000 (14:07 +0200)]
ASoC: meson: axg-tdm-formatter: add reset to the bindings documentation

Add an optional reset property to the tdm formatter bindings. The
dedicated reset line is present on some SoC families, such as the g12a.

Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190703120749.32341-2-jbrunet@baylibre.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: max98357a: avoid speaker pop when playback startup
Mac Chiang [Wed, 19 Jun 2019 10:18:33 +0000 (18:18 +0800)]
ASoC: max98357a: avoid speaker pop when playback startup

Loud speaker pop happens during playback even when in slience
playback. Specify Max98357a amp delay times to make sure
clocks are always earlier than sdmode on.

Signed-off-by: Mac Chiang <mac.chiang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: pxa: pxa2xx-ac97.c: use devm_snd_soc_register_component()
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 04:10:31 +0000 (13:10 +0900)]
ASoC: pxa: pxa2xx-ac97.c: use devm_snd_soc_register_component()

We have devm_xxx version of snd_soc_register_component,
let's use it.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: cros_ec_codec: use devm_snd_soc_register_component()
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 04:09:50 +0000 (13:09 +0900)]
ASoC: cros_ec_codec: use devm_snd_soc_register_component()

We have devm_xxx version of snd_soc_register_component,
let's use it.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: ak4118: use devm_snd_soc_register_component()
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 04:09:40 +0000 (13:09 +0900)]
ASoC: ak4118: use devm_snd_soc_register_component()

We have devm_xxx version of snd_soc_register_component,
let's use it.

This patch also removes related empty functions

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: rt5682: use devm_snd_soc_register_component()
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 04:09:28 +0000 (13:09 +0900)]
ASoC: rt5682: use devm_snd_soc_register_component()

We have devm_xxx version of snd_soc_register_component,
let's use it.

This patch also removes related empty functions

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: cirrus: ep93xx-i2s.c: use devm_snd_soc_register_component()
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 04:09:00 +0000 (13:09 +0900)]
ASoC: cirrus: ep93xx-i2s.c: use devm_snd_soc_register_component()

We have devm_xxx version of snd_soc_register_component,
let's use it.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: au1x: psc-i2s.c: use devm_snd_soc_register_component()
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 04:08:48 +0000 (13:08 +0900)]
ASoC: au1x: psc-i2s.c: use devm_snd_soc_register_component()

We have devm_xxx version of snd_soc_register_component,
let's use it.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: rt1308: Fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings
YueHaibing [Tue, 2 Jul 2019 06:17:38 +0000 (06:17 +0000)]
ASoC: rt1308: Fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings

Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically
Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci

Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: madera: Remove duplicated include from cs47l35.c
YueHaibing [Sat, 29 Jun 2019 02:43:33 +0000 (02:43 +0000)]
ASoC: madera: Remove duplicated include from cs47l35.c

Remove duplicated include.

Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: rt1308: Add RT1308 amplifier driver
Derek Fang [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 12:51:43 +0000 (20:51 +0800)]
ASoC: rt1308: Add RT1308 amplifier driver

This is the initial amplifier driver for rt1308.

Signed-off-by: Derek Fang <derek.fang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: soc-utils: respawn dummy Platform
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:50:04 +0000 (10:50 +0900)]
ASoC: soc-utils: respawn dummy Platform

commit 64ee5067cf64 ("ASoC: soc-utils: remove dummy Platform") removed
dummy Platform from ALSA SoC, but it is over-kill.
This patch respawn it.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: rockchip: rk3399_gru_sound: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:49:52 +0000 (10:49 +0900)]
ASoC: rockchip: rk3399_gru_sound: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit 961fb3c206dc ("ASoC: rockchip: rk3399_gru_sound: don't select
unnecessary Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit 961fb3c206dc ("ASoC: rockchip: rk3399_gru_sound: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: qcom: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:49:48 +0000 (10:49 +0900)]
ASoC: qcom: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit 0814c6412967 ("ASoC: qcom: don't select unnecessary Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit 0814c6412967 ("ASoC: qcom: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: simple-card-utils: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:49:44 +0000 (10:49 +0900)]
ASoC: simple-card-utils: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit 6f0437445735 ("ASoC: simple-card-utils: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit 6f0437445735 ("ASoC: simple-card-utils: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: ux500: mop500: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:49:40 +0000 (10:49 +0900)]
ASoC: ux500: mop500: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit 9ae6cdb184b6 ("ASoC: ux500: mop500: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit 9ae6cdb184b6 ("ASoC: ux500: mop500: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: ti: rx51: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:49:34 +0000 (10:49 +0900)]
ASoC: ti: rx51: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit f0edc6c1ee48 ("ASoC: ti: rx51: don't select unnecessary Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit f0edc6c1ee48 ("ASoC: ti: rx51: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: ti: omap-twl4030: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:49:30 +0000 (10:49 +0900)]
ASoC: ti: omap-twl4030: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit bfe1273c65e1 ("ASoC: ti: omap-twl4030: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit bfe1273c65e1 ("ASoC: ti: omap-twl4030: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: ti: omap-hdmi: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:49:26 +0000 (10:49 +0900)]
ASoC: ti: omap-hdmi: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit edba13aeae88 ("ASoC: ti: omap-hdmi: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit edba13aeae88 ("ASoC: ti: omap-hdmi: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: ti: omap-abe-twl6040: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:49:22 +0000 (10:49 +0900)]
ASoC: ti: omap-abe-twl6040: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit 1306ab2eddd1 ("ASoC: ti: omap-abe-twl6040: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit 1306ab2eddd1 ("ASoC: ti: omap-abe-twl6040: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: ti: davinci-evm: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:49:18 +0000 (10:49 +0900)]
ASoC: ti: davinci-evm: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit f46da1b9046e ("ASoC: ti: davinci-evm: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit f46da1b9046e ("ASoC: ti: davinci-evm: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: tegra: trimslice: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:49:14 +0000 (10:49 +0900)]
ASoC: tegra: trimslice: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit 567b374d9973 ("ASoC: tegra: trimslice: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit 567b374d9973 ("ASoC: tegra: trimslice: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: tegra: tegra_wm9712: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:49:10 +0000 (10:49 +0900)]
ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm9712: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit 5d62677238e9 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm9712: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit 5d62677238e9 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm9712: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: tegra: tegra_wm8903: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:49:06 +0000 (10:49 +0900)]
ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm8903: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit b28d98527157 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm8903: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit b28d98527157 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm8903: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: tegra: tegra_wm8753: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:49:02 +0000 (10:49 +0900)]
ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm8753: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit 404b229b84af ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm8753: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit 404b229b84af ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm8753: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: tegra: tegra_sgtl5000: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:48:58 +0000 (10:48 +0900)]
ASoC: tegra: tegra_sgtl5000: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit cee1cf3f9f9e ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_sgtl5000: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit cee1cf3f9f9e ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_sgtl5000: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: tegra: tegra_rt5677: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:48:53 +0000 (10:48 +0900)]
ASoC: tegra: tegra_rt5677: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit d035d13b2277 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_rt5677: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit d035d13b2277 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_rt5677: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: tegra: tegra_rt5640: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:48:49 +0000 (10:48 +0900)]
ASoC: tegra: tegra_rt5640: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit 1d641e1523ca ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_rt5640: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit 1d641e1523ca ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_rt5640: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: tegra: tegra_max98090: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:48:45 +0000 (10:48 +0900)]
ASoC: tegra: tegra_max98090: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit 4bfd08540b44 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_max98090: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit 4bfd08540b44 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_max98090: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: tegra: tegra_alc5632: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:48:40 +0000 (10:48 +0900)]
ASoC: tegra: tegra_alc5632: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit e7fc99e641da ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_alc5632: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit e7fc99e641da ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_alc5632: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: sunxi: sun4i-codec: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:48:35 +0000 (10:48 +0900)]
ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-codec: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit 3f780533bac9 ("ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-codec: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit 3f780533bac9 ("ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-codec: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: sirf: sirf-audio: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:48:31 +0000 (10:48 +0900)]
ASoC: sirf: sirf-audio: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit e562a5f13c94 ("ASoC: sirf: sirf-audio: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit e562a5f13c94 ("ASoC: sirf: sirf-audio: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: samsung: tm2_wm5110: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:48:27 +0000 (10:48 +0900)]
ASoC: samsung: tm2_wm5110: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit ae7cbcc43b8c ("ASoC: samsung: tm2_wm5110: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit ae7cbcc43b8c ("ASoC: samsung: tm2_wm5110: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: samsung: snow: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:48:23 +0000 (10:48 +0900)]
ASoC: samsung: snow: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit a555b6a959e6 ("ASoC: samsung: snow: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit a555b6a959e6 ("ASoC: samsung: snow: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: samsung: smdk_wm8994: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:48:19 +0000 (10:48 +0900)]
ASoC: samsung: smdk_wm8994: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit d815e0f08fdd ("ASoC: samsung: smdk_wm8994: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit d815e0f08fdd ("ASoC: samsung: smdk_wm8994: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: samsung: arndale_rt5631: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:48:15 +0000 (10:48 +0900)]
ASoC: samsung: arndale_rt5631: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit 33949eb5019d ("ASoC: samsung: arndale_rt5631: don't select
unnecessary Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit 33949eb5019d ("ASoC: samsung: arndale_rt5631: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: rockchip: rockchip_rt5645: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:48:01 +0000 (10:48 +0900)]
ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_rt5645: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit 27a37973a6f1 ("ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_rt5645: don't select
unnecessary Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit 27a37973a6f1 ("ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_rt5645: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: rockchip: rockchip_max98090: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:47:57 +0000 (10:47 +0900)]
ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_max98090: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit 7df405ae5895 ("ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_max98090: don't select
unnecessary Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit 7df405ae5895 ("ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_max98090: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: rockchip: rk3288_hdmi_analog: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:47:54 +0000 (10:47 +0900)]
ASoC: rockchip: rk3288_hdmi_analog: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit 9c21e82c165c ("ASoC: rockchip: rk3288_hdmi_analog: don't select
unnecessary Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit 9c21e82c165c ("ASoC: rockchip: rk3288_hdmi_analog: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: qcom: storm: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:47:50 +0000 (10:47 +0900)]
ASoC: qcom: storm: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit 3caf11fa88a9 ("ASoC: qcom: storm: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit 3caf11fa88a9 ("ASoC: qcom: storm: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: qcom: apq8016_sbc: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:47:46 +0000 (10:47 +0900)]
ASoC: qcom: apq8016_sbc: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit 564684387969 ("ASoC: qcom: apq8016_sbc: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit 564684387969 ("ASoC: qcom: apq8016_sbc: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: mxs: mxs-sgtl5000: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:47:42 +0000 (10:47 +0900)]
ASoC: mxs: mxs-sgtl5000: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit 5f92229d184b ("ASoC: mxs: mxs-sgtl5000: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit 5f92229d184b ("ASoC: mxs: mxs-sgtl5000: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: kirkwood: armada-370-db: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:47:38 +0000 (10:47 +0900)]
ASoC: kirkwood: armada-370-db: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit 717f16331712 ("ASoC: kirkwood: armada-370-db: don't select
unnecessary Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit 717f16331712 ("ASoC: kirkwood: armada-370-db: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: fsl: imx-audmix: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:47:35 +0000 (10:47 +0900)]
ASoC: fsl: imx-audmix: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit d8893261a7d32 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-audmix: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit d8893261a7d32 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-audmix: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: fsl: imx-spdif: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:47:30 +0000 (10:47 +0900)]
ASoC: fsl: imx-spdif: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit 014f07ca1cb12 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-spdif: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit 014f07ca1cb12 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-spdif: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: fsl: imx-sgtl5000: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:47:26 +0000 (10:47 +0900)]
ASoC: fsl: imx-sgtl5000: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit 82bf78ca49a3 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-sgtl5000: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit 82bf78ca49a3 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-sgtl5000: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: fsl: imx-es8328: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:47:22 +0000 (10:47 +0900)]
ASoC: fsl: imx-es8328: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit 577cf50d4dc8 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-es8328: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit 577cf50d4dc8 ("ASoC: fsl: imx-es8328: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: fsl: fsl-asoc-card: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:47:18 +0000 (10:47 +0900)]
ASoC: fsl: fsl-asoc-card: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit e57a4c2f15df27 ("ASoC: fsl: fsl-asoc-card: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit e57a4c2f15df27 ("ASoC: fsl: fsl-asoc-card: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: fsl: eukrea-tlv320: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:47:14 +0000 (10:47 +0900)]
ASoC: fsl: eukrea-tlv320: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit 2058ea1c4f514a ("ASoC: fsl: eukrea-tlv320: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit 2058ea1c4f514a ("ASoC: fsl: eukrea-tlv320: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: atmel: tse850-pcm5142: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:47:10 +0000 (10:47 +0900)]
ASoC: atmel: tse850-pcm5142: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit 655368dfc75e8 ("ASoC: atmel: tse850-pcm5142: don't select
unnecessary Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit 655368dfc75e8 ("ASoC: atmel: tse850-pcm5142: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: atmel: sam9x5_wm8731: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:47:06 +0000 (10:47 +0900)]
ASoC: atmel: sam9x5_wm8731: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit ced5b08020cd ("ASoC: atmel: sam9x5_wm8731: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit ced5b08020cd ("ASoC: atmel: sam9x5_wm8731: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: atmel: sam9g20_wm8731: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:47:02 +0000 (10:47 +0900)]
ASoC: atmel: sam9g20_wm8731: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit bfc7938e58142a5 ("ASoC: atmel: sam9g20_wm8731: don't select
unnecessary Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit bfc7938e58142a5 ("ASoC: atmel: sam9g20_wm8731: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: amtel: mikroe-proto: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:46:49 +0000 (10:46 +0900)]
ASoC: amtel: mikroe-proto: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit 318ebbe8060d96 ("ASoC: atmel: mikroe-proto: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit 318ebbe8060d96 ("ASoC: atmel: mikroe-proto: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: atmel: atmel_wm8904: consider CPU-Platform possibility unnecessary Platform"
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:46:37 +0000 (10:46 +0900)]
ASoC: atmel: atmel_wm8904: consider CPU-Platform possibility unnecessary Platform"

commit 3609750e9d4ba9db ("ASoC: atmel: atmel_wm8904: don't select
unnecessary Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit 3609750e9d4ba9db ("ASoC: atmel: atmel_wm8904: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: atmel: atmel-pdmic: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:46:24 +0000 (10:46 +0900)]
ASoC: atmel: atmel-pdmic: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit 7baf32e164da5d4 ("ASoC: atmel: atmel-pdmic: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit 7baf32e164da5d4 ("ASoC: atmel: atmel-pdmic: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: atmel: atmel-classd: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:46:19 +0000 (10:46 +0900)]
ASoC: atmel: atmel-classd: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit 02602401e5316 ("ASoC: atmel: atmel-classd: don't select
unnecessary Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit 02602401e5316 ("ASoC: atmel: atmel-classd: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: vc4: vc4_htmi: consider CPU-Platform possibility
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:46:14 +0000 (10:46 +0900)]
ASoC: vc4: vc4_htmi: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit 6c6de1c9e2bf2 ("ASoC: vc4: vc4_hdmi: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit 6c6de1c9e2bf2 ("ASoC: vc4: vc4_hdmi: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: topology: fix memory leaks on sm, se and sbe
Colin Ian King [Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:32:08 +0000 (14:32 +0100)]
ASoC: topology: fix memory leaks on sm, se and sbe

Currently when a kstrdup fails the error exit paths don't free
the allocations for sm, se and sbe.  This can be fixed by assigning
kc[i].private_value to these before doing the ksrtdup so that the error
exit path will be able to free these objects.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Resource leak")
Fixes: 9f90af3a9952 ("ASoC: topology: Consolidate and fix asoc_tplg_dapm_widget_*_create flow")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: atmel: atmel-pcm-dma.c: use devm_snd_dmaengine_pcm_register()
Kuninori Morimoto [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 04:07:05 +0000 (13:07 +0900)]
ASoC: atmel: atmel-pcm-dma.c: use devm_snd_dmaengine_pcm_register()

We have devm_xxx version of snd_dmaengine_pcm_register,
let's use it.

This patch also removes related empty functions

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: meson: axg-card: remove useless check on codec
Jerome Brunet [Fri, 28 Jun 2019 08:17:08 +0000 (10:17 +0200)]
ASoC: meson: axg-card: remove useless check on codec

While checking cpus before dereferencing the pointer is required, it is
not necessary for codecs. 'codec' can't possibly be NULL in the loop

Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: soc-core: support dai_link with platforms_num != 1
Jerome Brunet [Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:13:50 +0000 (14:13 +0200)]
ASoC: soc-core: support dai_link with platforms_num != 1

Add support platforms_num != 1 in dai_link. Initially, the main purpose of
this change was to make the platform optional in the dai_link, instead of
inserting the dummy platform driver.

This particular case had just been solved by Kuninori Morimoto with
commit 1d7689892878 ("ASoC: soc-core: allow no Platform on dai_link").

However, this change may still be useful for those who need multiple
platform components on a single dai_link (it solves one of the FIXME
note in soc-core)

Acked-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: soc-core: defer card registration if codec component is missing
Jerome Brunet [Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:13:49 +0000 (14:13 +0200)]
ASoC: soc-core: defer card registration if codec component is missing

Like cpus and platforms, defer sound card initialization if the codec
component is missing when initializing the dai_link

Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: codecs: ad193x: Reset used registers at probe
Codrin Ciubotariu [Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:02:08 +0000 (15:02 +0300)]
ASoC: codecs: ad193x: Reset used registers at probe

Since the ad193x codecs have no software reset, we have to reinitialize the
registers after a hardware reset to assure no previous values are kept.

Signed-off-by: Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: codecs: ad193x: Group register initialization at probe
Codrin Ciubotariu [Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:02:07 +0000 (15:02 +0300)]
ASoC: codecs: ad193x: Group register initialization at probe

Create a structure with the register initialization values at probe and
use it to initialize all the registers at once.

Signed-off-by: Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoMerge tag 'v5.2-rc6' into asoc-5.3
Mark Brown [Wed, 26 Jun 2019 11:39:34 +0000 (12:39 +0100)]
Merge tag 'v5.2-rc6' into asoc-5.3

Linux 5.2-rc6

5 years agoASoC: soc-core: don't use soc_find_component() at snd_soc_find_dai()
Kuninori Morimoto [Wed, 26 Jun 2019 01:40:59 +0000 (10:40 +0900)]
ASoC: soc-core: don't use soc_find_component() at snd_soc_find_dai()

commit b9f2e25c599bb ("ASoC: soc-core: use soc_find_component() at
snd_soc_find_dai()") used soc_find_component() at snd_soc_find_dai(),
but, some CPU driver has CPU component for DAI and Platform component,
for example generic DMAEngine component.
In such case, CPU component and Platform component have same
of_node / name.

Here soc_find_component() returns *1st* found component.
Thus, we shouldn't use soc_find_component() at snd_soc_find_dai().
This patch fixup this it, and add comment to indicate this limitation.

Fixes: commit b9f2e25c599bb ("ASoC: soc-core: use soc_find_component() at snd_soc_find_dai()")
Reported-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: rsnd: add missing pin sharing with SSI9
Kuninori Morimoto [Wed, 26 Jun 2019 02:00:05 +0000 (11:00 +0900)]
ASoC: rsnd: add missing pin sharing with SSI9

When SSI9 is sharing pin with SSI0, we need to care about it,
but is missing. This patch fixup it.

Reported-by: Hien Dang <hien.dang.eb@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Tested-by: Chaoliang Qin <chaoliang.qin.jg@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
5 years agoASoC: rsnd: ssiu: tidyup SSI_MODE1/2 settings
Kuninori Morimoto [Wed, 26 Jun 2019 01:58:56 +0000 (10:58 +0900)]
ASoC: rsnd: ssiu: tidyup SSI_MODE1/2 settings

R-Car Sound can use pin sharing and multi-SSI for
SSI0/1/2/3/4/9.
Because complex HW settings and spaghetti code,
the settings for SSI9 pin sharing with SSI0 doesn't work.

This patch tidyup settings for it.

Reported-by: Hien Dang <hien.dang.eb@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Tested-by: Chaoliang Qin <chaoliang.qin.jg@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>