From: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 15:17:29 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: mtd: atmel_nand: using a stronger ECC is not dangerous
X-Git-Url: http://git.lede-project.org./?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f666d6495a4350ebe4ebb8c071b290f9f49514bf;p=openwrt%2Fstaging%2Fblogic.git

mtd: atmel_nand: using a stronger ECC is not dangerous

We don't have to issue a warning when a stronger error correcting
capability is chosen.

Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
---

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
index 7e50ed89e18a..08715106f925 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
@@ -995,7 +995,7 @@ static int __init atmel_pmecc_nand_init_params(struct platform_device *pdev,
 		return err_no;
 	}
 
-	if (cap != host->pmecc_corr_cap ||
+	if (cap > host->pmecc_corr_cap ||
 			sector_size != host->pmecc_sector_size)
 		dev_info(host->dev, "WARNING: Be Caution! Using different PMECC parameters from Nand ONFI ECC reqirement.\n");