From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 19:06:41 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: drm/atomic: Reject FLIP_ASYNC unconditionally
X-Git-Url: http://git.lede-project.org./?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f2cbda2dba11de868759cae9c0d2bab5b8411406;p=openwrt%2Fstaging%2Fblogic.git

drm/atomic: Reject FLIP_ASYNC unconditionally

It's never been wired up. Only userspace that tried to use it (and
didn't actually check whether anything works, but hey it builds) is
the -modesetting atomic implementation. And we just shut that up.

If there's anyone else then we need to silently accept this flag no
matter what, and find a new one. Because once a flag is tainted, it's
lost.

Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Cc: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190903190642.32588-2-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
---

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c
index 5a5b42db6f2a..7a26bfb5329c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c
@@ -1305,8 +1305,7 @@ int drm_mode_atomic_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
 	if (arg->reserved)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if ((arg->flags & DRM_MODE_PAGE_FLIP_ASYNC) &&
-			!dev->mode_config.async_page_flip)
+	if (arg->flags & DRM_MODE_PAGE_FLIP_ASYNC)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	/* can't test and expect an event at the same time. */