From: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:05:45 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: perf/x86: Enable overflow on Intel KNC with a custom knc_pmu_handle_irq()
X-Git-Url: http://git.lede-project.org./?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e4074b3049f99c6ad6e1a33e6d93d8ec0652e2c1;p=openwrt%2Fstaging%2Fblogic.git

perf/x86: Enable overflow on Intel KNC with a custom knc_pmu_handle_irq()

Although based on the Intel P6 design, the interrupt mechnanism
for KNC more closely resembles the Intel architectural
perfmon one.

We can't just re-use that code though, because KNC has different
MSR numbers for the status and ack registers.

In this case we just cut-and paste from perf_event_intel.c
with some minor changes, as it looks like it would not be
worth the trouble to change that code to be MSR-configurable.

Signed-off-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Cc: eranian@gmail.com
Cc: Meadows Lawrence F <lawrence.f.meadows@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.02.1210171304410.23243@vincent-weaver-1.um.maine.edu
[ Small stylistic edits. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_knc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_knc.c
index f3a2af41552d..4b7731bf23a8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_knc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_knc.c
@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
 #include <linux/perf_event.h>
 #include <linux/types.h>
 
+#include <asm/hardirq.h>
+
 #include "perf_event.h"
 
 static const u64 knc_perfmon_event_map[] =
@@ -193,6 +195,80 @@ static void knc_pmu_enable_event(struct perf_event *event)
 	(void)wrmsrl_safe(hwc->config_base + hwc->idx, val);
 }
 
+static inline u64 knc_pmu_get_status(void)
+{
+	u64 status;
+
+	rdmsrl(MSR_KNC_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS, status);
+
+	return status;
+}
+
+static inline void knc_pmu_ack_status(u64 ack)
+{
+	wrmsrl(MSR_KNC_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CONTROL, ack);
+}
+
+static int knc_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	struct perf_sample_data data;
+	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc;
+	int handled = 0;
+	int bit, loops;
+	u64 status;
+
+	cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
+
+	knc_pmu_disable_all();
+
+	status = knc_pmu_get_status();
+	if (!status) {
+		knc_pmu_enable_all(0);
+		return handled;
+	}
+
+	loops = 0;
+again:
+	knc_pmu_ack_status(status);
+	if (++loops > 100) {
+		WARN_ONCE(1, "perf: irq loop stuck!\n");
+		perf_event_print_debug();
+		goto done;
+	}
+
+	inc_irq_stat(apic_perf_irqs);
+
+	for_each_set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&status, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX) {
+		struct perf_event *event = cpuc->events[bit];
+
+		handled++;
+
+		if (!test_bit(bit, cpuc->active_mask))
+			continue;
+
+		if (!intel_pmu_save_and_restart(event))
+			continue;
+
+		perf_sample_data_init(&data, 0, event->hw.last_period);
+
+		if (perf_event_overflow(event, &data, regs))
+			x86_pmu_stop(event, 0);
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Repeat if there is more work to be done:
+	 */
+	status = knc_pmu_get_status();
+	if (status)
+		goto again;
+
+done:
+	knc_pmu_enable_all(0);
+
+	return handled;
+}
+
+
 PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(event,	"config:0-7"	);
 PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(umask,	"config:8-15"	);
 PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(edge,	"config:18"	);
@@ -210,7 +286,7 @@ static struct attribute *intel_knc_formats_attr[] = {
 
 static __initconst struct x86_pmu knc_pmu = {
 	.name			= "knc",
-	.handle_irq		= x86_pmu_handle_irq,
+	.handle_irq		= knc_pmu_handle_irq,
 	.disable_all		= knc_pmu_disable_all,
 	.enable_all		= knc_pmu_enable_all,
 	.enable			= knc_pmu_enable_event,