From: Gustavo A. R. Silva Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 04:30:27 +0000 (-0600) Subject: scsi: isci: request: mark expected switch fall-through X-Git-Url: http://git.lede-project.org./?a=commitdiff_plain;h=da7903092b880b25971ca9103cb0b934a44ace2b;p=openwrt%2Fstaging%2Fblogic.git scsi: isci: request: mark expected switch fall-through In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that, in this particular case, a dash is added as a token in order to separate the "Fall through" annotation from the rest of the comment on the same line, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Acked-by: Artur Paszkiewicz Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen --- diff --git a/drivers/scsi/isci/request.c b/drivers/scsi/isci/request.c index 2f151708b59a..1b18cf55167e 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/isci/request.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/isci/request.c @@ -894,7 +894,7 @@ sci_io_request_terminate(struct isci_request *ireq) * and don't wait for the task response. */ sci_change_state(&ireq->sm, SCI_REQ_ABORTING); - /* Fall through and handle like ABORTING... */ + /* Fall through - and handle like ABORTING... */ case SCI_REQ_ABORTING: if (!isci_remote_device_is_safe_to_abort(ireq->target_device)) set_bit(IREQ_PENDING_ABORT, &ireq->flags);