From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 05:01:59 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: ecryptfs_inode_permission() doesn't need to bail out on RCU
X-Git-Url: http://git.lede-project.org./?a=commitdiff_plain;h=beefebf1aa611242e022e71bae87034f415d3314;p=openwrt%2Fstaging%2Fblogic.git

ecryptfs_inode_permission() doesn't need to bail out on RCU

... now that inode_permission() can take MAY_NOT_BLOCK and handle it
properly.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---

diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c b/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
index bec75f8e91ac..799e01055f22 100644
--- a/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
@@ -944,8 +944,6 @@ int ecryptfs_truncate(struct dentry *dentry, loff_t new_length)
 static int
 ecryptfs_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask)
 {
-	if (mask & MAY_NOT_BLOCK)
-		return -ECHILD;
 	return inode_permission(ecryptfs_inode_to_lower(inode), mask);
 }