From: Nick Hainke Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2023 20:28:40 +0000 (+0100) Subject: e2fsprogs: update to 1.46.6 X-Git-Url: http://git.lede-project.org./?a=commitdiff_plain;h=b6bc924b198a7a3b7f558430eec4f7f49bac4ea1;p=openwrt%2Fstaging%2Fstintel.git e2fsprogs: update to 1.46.6 Release information: https://e2fsprogs.sourceforge.net/e2fsprogs-release.html#1.46.6 Remove upstreamed patch: - 004-CVE-2022-1304-libext2fs-add-sanity-check-to-extent-manipulation.patch Signed-off-by: Nick Hainke --- diff --git a/package/utils/e2fsprogs/Makefile b/package/utils/e2fsprogs/Makefile index 94f22a53cc..82817d95ce 100644 --- a/package/utils/e2fsprogs/Makefile +++ b/package/utils/e2fsprogs/Makefile @@ -8,12 +8,12 @@ include $(TOPDIR)/rules.mk PKG_NAME:=e2fsprogs -PKG_VERSION:=1.46.5 -PKG_RELEASE:=2 +PKG_VERSION:=1.46.6 +PKG_RELEASE:=1 PKG_SOURCE:=$(PKG_NAME)-$(PKG_VERSION).tar.xz PKG_SOURCE_URL:=@KERNEL/linux/kernel/people/tytso/e2fsprogs/v$(PKG_VERSION)/ -PKG_HASH:=2f16c9176704cf645dc69d5b15ff704ae722d665df38b2ed3cfc249757d8d81e +PKG_HASH:=a77517f19ff5e4e97ede63536566865dd5d48654e13fc145f5f2249ef7c4f4fc PKG_LICENSE:=GPL-2.0 PKG_LICENSE_FILES:=NOTICE diff --git a/package/utils/e2fsprogs/patches/004-CVE-2022-1304-libext2fs-add-sanity-check-to-extent-manipulation.patch b/package/utils/e2fsprogs/patches/004-CVE-2022-1304-libext2fs-add-sanity-check-to-extent-manipulation.patch deleted file mode 100644 index e5a76161f2..0000000000 --- a/package/utils/e2fsprogs/patches/004-CVE-2022-1304-libext2fs-add-sanity-check-to-extent-manipulation.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,50 +0,0 @@ -From ab51d587bb9b229b1fade1afd02e1574c1ba5c76 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Lukas Czerner -Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 19:31:48 +0200 -Subject: libext2fs: add sanity check to extent manipulation - -It is possible to have a corrupted extent tree in such a way that a leaf -node contains zero extents in it. Currently if that happens and we try -to traverse the tree we can end up accessing wrong data, or possibly -even uninitialized memory. Make sure we don't do that. - -Additionally make sure that we have a sane number of bytes passed to -memmove() in ext2fs_extent_delete(). - -Note that e2fsck is currently unable to spot and fix such corruption in -pass1. - -Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner -Reported-by: Nils Bars -Addresses: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068113 -Addresses: CVE-2022-1304 -Addresses-Debian-Bug: #1010263 -Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o ---- - lib/ext2fs/extent.c | 8 ++++++++ - 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) - ---- a/lib/ext2fs/extent.c -+++ b/lib/ext2fs/extent.c -@@ -495,6 +495,10 @@ retry: - ext2fs_le16_to_cpu(eh->eh_entries); - newpath->max_entries = ext2fs_le16_to_cpu(eh->eh_max); - -+ /* Make sure there is at least one extent present */ -+ if (newpath->left <= 0) -+ return EXT2_ET_EXTENT_NO_DOWN; -+ - if (path->left > 0) { - ix++; - newpath->end_blk = ext2fs_le32_to_cpu(ix->ei_block); -@@ -1630,6 +1634,10 @@ errcode_t ext2fs_extent_delete(ext2_exte - - cp = path->curr; - -+ /* Sanity check before memmove() */ -+ if (path->left < 0) -+ return EXT2_ET_EXTENT_LEAF_BAD; -+ - if (path->left) { - memmove(cp, cp + sizeof(struct ext3_extent_idx), - path->left * sizeof(struct ext3_extent_idx));