From: Johannes Berg Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 14:11:14 +0000 (+0200) Subject: iwlwifi: mvm: move queue reconfiguration into new function X-Git-Url: http://git.lede-project.org./?a=commitdiff_plain;h=b342228d6bc51b920cb1d2f81f13c45735379507;p=openwrt%2Fstaging%2Fblogic.git iwlwifi: mvm: move queue reconfiguration into new function If TVQM is used we skip over this, move the code into a new function to get rid of the label. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho --- diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/sta.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/sta.c index 5b6ec7de8043..a36a631cdfa6 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/sta.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/sta.c @@ -1351,6 +1351,33 @@ static void iwl_mvm_remove_inactive_tids(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, } } +static void iwl_mvm_reconfigure_queue(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, int queue) +{ + bool reconfig; + bool change_owner; + + spin_lock_bh(&mvm->queue_info_lock); + reconfig = mvm->queue_info[queue].status == IWL_MVM_QUEUE_RECONFIGURING; + + /* + * We need to take into account a situation in which a TXQ was + * allocated to TID x, and then turned shared by adding TIDs y + * and z. If TID x becomes inactive and is removed from the TXQ, + * ownership must be given to one of the remaining TIDs. + * This is mainly because if TID x continues - a new queue can't + * be allocated for it as long as it is an owner of another TXQ. + */ + change_owner = !(mvm->queue_info[queue].tid_bitmap & + BIT(mvm->queue_info[queue].txq_tid)) && + (mvm->queue_info[queue].status == IWL_MVM_QUEUE_SHARED); + spin_unlock_bh(&mvm->queue_info_lock); + + if (reconfig) + iwl_mvm_unshare_queue(mvm, queue); + else if (change_owner) + iwl_mvm_change_queue_owner(mvm, queue); +} + static void iwl_mvm_inactivity_check(struct iwl_mvm *mvm) { unsigned long now = jiffies; @@ -1504,7 +1531,7 @@ void iwl_mvm_add_new_dqa_stream_wk(struct work_struct *wk) struct ieee80211_sta *sta; struct iwl_mvm_sta *mvmsta; unsigned long deferred_tid_traffic; - int queue, sta_id, tid; + int sta_id, tid; /* Check inactivity of queues */ iwl_mvm_inactivity_check(mvm); @@ -1512,39 +1539,14 @@ void iwl_mvm_add_new_dqa_stream_wk(struct work_struct *wk) mutex_lock(&mvm->mutex); /* No queue reconfiguration in TVQM mode */ - if (iwl_mvm_has_new_tx_api(mvm)) - goto alloc_queues; - - /* Reconfigure queues requiring reconfiguation */ - for (queue = 0; queue < ARRAY_SIZE(mvm->queue_info); queue++) { - bool reconfig; - bool change_owner; - - spin_lock_bh(&mvm->queue_info_lock); - reconfig = (mvm->queue_info[queue].status == - IWL_MVM_QUEUE_RECONFIGURING); - - /* - * We need to take into account a situation in which a TXQ was - * allocated to TID x, and then turned shared by adding TIDs y - * and z. If TID x becomes inactive and is removed from the TXQ, - * ownership must be given to one of the remaining TIDs. - * This is mainly because if TID x continues - a new queue can't - * be allocated for it as long as it is an owner of another TXQ. - */ - change_owner = !(mvm->queue_info[queue].tid_bitmap & - BIT(mvm->queue_info[queue].txq_tid)) && - (mvm->queue_info[queue].status == - IWL_MVM_QUEUE_SHARED); - spin_unlock_bh(&mvm->queue_info_lock); + if (!iwl_mvm_has_new_tx_api(mvm)) { + int queue; - if (reconfig) - iwl_mvm_unshare_queue(mvm, queue); - else if (change_owner) - iwl_mvm_change_queue_owner(mvm, queue); + /* Reconfigure queues requiring reconfiguation */ + for (queue = 0; queue < ARRAY_SIZE(mvm->queue_info); queue++) + iwl_mvm_reconfigure_queue(mvm, queue); } -alloc_queues: /* Go over all stations with deferred traffic */ for_each_set_bit(sta_id, mvm->sta_deferred_frames, IWL_MVM_STATION_COUNT) {