From: Dan Williams Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:39:10 +0000 (-0700) Subject: dmaengine: kill some dubious WARN_ONCEs X-Git-Url: http://git.lede-project.org./?a=commitdiff_plain;h=83436a0560e9ef8af2f0796264dde4bed1415359;p=openwrt%2Fstaging%2Fblogic.git dmaengine: kill some dubious WARN_ONCEs dma_find_channel and dma_issue_pending_all are good places to warn about improper api usage. However, warning correctly means synchronizing with dma_list_mutex, i.e. too much overhead for these fast-path calls. Reported-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Dan Williams --- diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c index 6df144a65fef..a58993011edb 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c +++ b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c @@ -329,9 +329,6 @@ struct dma_chan *dma_find_channel(enum dma_transaction_type tx_type) struct dma_chan *chan; int cpu; - WARN_ONCE(dmaengine_ref_count == 0, - "client called %s without a reference", __func__); - cpu = get_cpu(); chan = per_cpu_ptr(channel_table[tx_type], cpu)->chan; put_cpu(); @@ -348,9 +345,6 @@ void dma_issue_pending_all(void) struct dma_device *device; struct dma_chan *chan; - WARN_ONCE(dmaengine_ref_count == 0, - "client called %s without a reference", __func__); - rcu_read_lock(); list_for_each_entry_rcu(device, &dma_device_list, global_node) { if (dma_has_cap(DMA_PRIVATE, device->cap_mask))