From: Dominique van den Broeck Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 17:14:21 +0000 (+0200) Subject: staging: fwserial: (coding style) removing "!= NULL" to comply with checkpatch.pl X-Git-Url: http://git.lede-project.org./?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7d47383dcb3f5867de56ac04ce46db06ac47ad0b;p=openwrt%2Fstaging%2Fblogic.git staging: fwserial: (coding style) removing "!= NULL" to comply with checkpatch.pl Removing two "!= NULL" from fwserial.c as suggested by checkpatch.pl. Note that the associated expression "port->port.console" is a 1-bit-field that is already assumed as an implicit boolean (that is: without comparison) Signed-off-by: Dominique van den Broeck Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- diff --git a/drivers/staging/fwserial/fwserial.c b/drivers/staging/fwserial/fwserial.c index 66e54e767c98..4dd5304cb718 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/fwserial/fwserial.c +++ b/drivers/staging/fwserial/fwserial.c @@ -1701,7 +1701,7 @@ static void fwserial_virt_plug_complete(struct fwtty_peer *peer, dma_fifo_change_tx_limit(&port->tx_fifo, port->max_payload); spin_unlock_bh(&peer->port->lock); - if (port->port.console && port->fwcon_ops->notify != NULL) + if (port->port.console && port->fwcon_ops->notify) (*port->fwcon_ops->notify)(FWCON_NOTIFY_ATTACH, port->con_data); fwtty_info(&peer->unit, "peer (guid:%016llx) connected on %s\n", @@ -1808,7 +1808,7 @@ static void fwserial_release_port(struct fwtty_port *port, bool reset) RCU_INIT_POINTER(port->peer, NULL); spin_unlock_bh(&port->lock); - if (port->port.console && port->fwcon_ops->notify != NULL) + if (port->port.console && port->fwcon_ops->notify) (*port->fwcon_ops->notify)(FWCON_NOTIFY_DETACH, port->con_data); }