From: Douglas RAILLARD Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 15:33:40 +0000 (+0100) Subject: sched/cpufreq: Align trace event behavior of fast switching X-Git-Url: http://git.lede-project.org./?a=commitdiff_plain;h=77c84dd1881d0f0176cb678d770bfbda26c54390;p=openwrt%2Fstaging%2Fblogic.git sched/cpufreq: Align trace event behavior of fast switching Fast switching path only emits an event for the CPU of interest, whereas the regular path emits an event for all the CPUs that had their frequency changed, i.e. all the CPUs sharing the same policy. With the current behavior, looking at cpu_frequency event for a given CPU that is using the fast switching path will not give the correct frequency signal. Signed-off-by: Douglas RAILLARD Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c index 867b4bb6d4be..b03ca2f73713 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ static void sugov_fast_switch(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, u64 time, unsigned int next_freq) { struct cpufreq_policy *policy = sg_policy->policy; + int cpu; if (!sugov_update_next_freq(sg_policy, time, next_freq)) return; @@ -126,7 +127,11 @@ static void sugov_fast_switch(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, u64 time, return; policy->cur = next_freq; - trace_cpu_frequency(next_freq, smp_processor_id()); + + if (trace_cpu_frequency_enabled()) { + for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus) + trace_cpu_frequency(next_freq, cpu); + } } static void sugov_deferred_update(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, u64 time,