From: Satyam Sharma Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 10:06:38 +0000 (-0700) Subject: Redefine {un}register_hotcpu_notifier() !HOTPLUG_CPU stubs X-Git-Url: http://git.lede-project.org./?a=commitdiff_plain;h=761bb431908e84d1793c5eb6c2ae2cc4926bed3e;p=openwrt%2Fstaging%2Fblogic.git Redefine {un}register_hotcpu_notifier() !HOTPLUG_CPU stubs The return of the present "do {} while" based stub definition of register_hotcpu_notifier() cannot be checked. This makes the stub asymmetric w.r.t. the real HOTPLUG_CPU=y implementation that is int-returning. So let us redefine this to be consistent with the full version. Also do the same for unregister_hotcpu_notifier(). We cannot define these as static inline functions due to an existing GCC bug (#33172). So define as macros that return appropriately instead (int '0' for the register_hotcpu_notifier case and void for unregister_hotcpu_notifier). Signed-off-by: Satyam Sharma Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- diff --git a/include/linux/cpu.h b/include/linux/cpu.h index 0ad72c4cf312..b79c57569367 100644 --- a/include/linux/cpu.h +++ b/include/linux/cpu.h @@ -119,8 +119,9 @@ static inline void cpuhotplug_mutex_unlock(struct mutex *cpu_hp_mutex) #define lock_cpu_hotplug() do { } while (0) #define unlock_cpu_hotplug() do { } while (0) #define hotcpu_notifier(fn, pri) do { (void)(fn); } while (0) -#define register_hotcpu_notifier(nb) do { (void)(nb); } while (0) -#define unregister_hotcpu_notifier(nb) do { (void)(nb); } while (0) +/* These aren't inline functions due to a GCC bug. */ +#define register_hotcpu_notifier(nb) ({ (void)(nb); 0; }) +#define unregister_hotcpu_notifier(nb) ({ (void)(nb); }) /* CPUs don't go offline once they're online w/o CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */ static inline int cpu_is_offline(int cpu) { return 0; }