From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 06:29:00 +0000 (-0500)
Subject: [ACPI] fix passive cooling regression
X-Git-Url: http://git.lede-project.org./?a=commitdiff_plain;h=75b245b3259133360845bc6de3aecb8a6bd6ab59;p=openwrt%2Fstaging%2Fblogic.git

[ACPI] fix passive cooling regression

Return logic was inverted.
Going for changing the return value to not return zero as it is makes
more sense regarding the naming of the function (cpu_has_cpufreq()).

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3410

Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
---

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
index f37584015324..dc9817cfb882 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
@@ -102,8 +102,8 @@ static int cpu_has_cpufreq(unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	struct cpufreq_policy policy;
 	if (!acpi_thermal_cpufreq_is_init || cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu))
-		return -ENODEV;
-	return 0;
+		return 0;
+	return 1;
 }
 
 static int acpi_thermal_cpufreq_increase(unsigned int cpu)