From: Krish Sadhukhan Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 18:30:09 +0000 (-0500) Subject: KVM: nVMX: Move the checks for VM-Exit Control Fields to a separate helper function X-Git-Url: http://git.lede-project.org./?a=commitdiff_plain;h=61446ba75e9ad95446e057ac59e23e257493a3b3;p=openwrt%2Fstaging%2Fblogic.git KVM: nVMX: Move the checks for VM-Exit Control Fields to a separate helper function .. to improve readability and maintainability, and to align the code as per the layout of the checks in chapter "VM Entries" in Intel SDM vol 3C. Signed-off-by: Krish Sadhukhan Reviewed-by: Mihai Carabas Reviewed-by: Mark Kanda Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c index f594ddce7280..8e6b4248b3d4 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c @@ -714,20 +714,28 @@ static int nested_vmx_check_msr_switch(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, return 0; } -static int nested_vmx_check_msr_switch_controls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, - struct vmcs12 *vmcs12) +static int nested_vmx_check_exit_msr_switch_controls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + struct vmcs12 *vmcs12) { if (nested_vmx_check_msr_switch(vcpu, vmcs12->vm_exit_msr_load_count, vmcs12->vm_exit_msr_load_addr) || nested_vmx_check_msr_switch(vcpu, vmcs12->vm_exit_msr_store_count, - vmcs12->vm_exit_msr_store_addr) || - nested_vmx_check_msr_switch(vcpu, vmcs12->vm_entry_msr_load_count, - vmcs12->vm_entry_msr_load_addr)) + vmcs12->vm_exit_msr_store_addr)) return -EINVAL; return 0; } +static int nested_vmx_check_msr_switch_controls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + struct vmcs12 *vmcs12) +{ + if (nested_vmx_check_msr_switch(vcpu, vmcs12->vm_entry_msr_load_count, + vmcs12->vm_entry_msr_load_addr)) + return -EINVAL; + + return 0; +} + static int nested_vmx_check_pml_controls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12) { @@ -2485,6 +2493,23 @@ static int nested_check_vm_execution_controls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, return 0; } +/* + * Checks related to VM-Exit Control Fields + */ +static int nested_check_vm_exit_controls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + struct vmcs12 *vmcs12) +{ + struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu); + + if (!vmx_control_verify(vmcs12->vm_exit_controls, + vmx->nested.msrs.exit_ctls_low, + vmx->nested.msrs.exit_ctls_high) || + nested_vmx_check_exit_msr_switch_controls(vcpu, vmcs12)) + return -EINVAL; + + return 0; +} + static int nested_vmx_check_vmentry_prereqs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12) { @@ -2495,7 +2520,8 @@ static int nested_vmx_check_vmentry_prereqs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, vmcs12->guest_activity_state != GUEST_ACTIVITY_HLT) return VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_CONTROL_FIELD; - if (nested_check_vm_execution_controls(vcpu, vmcs12)) + if (nested_check_vm_execution_controls(vcpu, vmcs12) || + nested_check_vm_exit_controls(vcpu, vmcs12)) return VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_CONTROL_FIELD; if (nested_vmx_check_msr_switch_controls(vcpu, vmcs12)) @@ -2506,10 +2532,7 @@ static int nested_vmx_check_vmentry_prereqs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, !nested_cr3_valid(vcpu, vmcs12->host_cr3)) return VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_HOST_STATE_FIELD; - if (!vmx_control_verify(vmcs12->vm_exit_controls, - vmx->nested.msrs.exit_ctls_low, - vmx->nested.msrs.exit_ctls_high) || - !vmx_control_verify(vmcs12->vm_entry_controls, + if (!vmx_control_verify(vmcs12->vm_entry_controls, vmx->nested.msrs.entry_ctls_low, vmx->nested.msrs.entry_ctls_high)) return VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_CONTROL_FIELD;