From: hersen wu <hersenxs.wu@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 21:57:56 +0000 (-0500)
Subject: drm/amd/display: dal-pplib interface refactor dal part
X-Git-Url: http://git.lede-project.org./?a=commitdiff_plain;h=588715bdcfbc2592f50b433a3ebaac72014d5fb4;p=openwrt%2Fstaging%2Fblogic.git

drm/amd/display: dal-pplib interface refactor dal part

[WHY] clarify dal input parameters to pplib interface, remove
un-used parameters. dal knows exactly which parameters needed
and their effects at pplib and smu sides.

current dal sequence for dcn1_update_clock to pplib:

1.smu10_display_clock_voltage_request for dcefclk
2.smu10_display_clock_voltage_request for fclk
3.phm_store_dal_configuration_data {
   set_min_deep_sleep_dcfclk
   set_active_display_count
   store_cc6_data --- this data never be referenced

new sequence will be:

1. set_display_count  --- need add new pplib interface
2. set_min_deep_sleep_dcfclk -- new pplib interface
3. set_hard_min_dcfclk_by_freq
4. set_hard_min_fclk_by_freq

after this code refactor, smu10_display_clock_voltage_request,
phm_store_dal_configuration_data will not be needed for rv.

Signed-off-by: hersen wu <hersenxs.wu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Acked-by: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
---

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_pp_smu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_pp_smu.c
index 9d2d6986b983..e8e9eebbae3f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_pp_smu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_pp_smu.c
@@ -559,6 +559,58 @@ void pp_rv_set_pme_wa_enable(struct pp_smu *pp)
 	pp_funcs->notify_smu_enable_pwe(pp_handle);
 }
 
+void pp_rv_set_active_display_count(struct pp_smu *pp, int count)
+{
+	const struct dc_context *ctx = pp->dm;
+	struct amdgpu_device *adev = ctx->driver_context;
+	void *pp_handle = adev->powerplay.pp_handle;
+	const struct amd_pm_funcs *pp_funcs = adev->powerplay.pp_funcs;
+
+	if (!pp_funcs || !pp_funcs->set_active_display_count)
+		return;
+
+	pp_funcs->set_active_display_count(pp_handle, count);
+}
+
+void pp_rv_set_min_deep_sleep_dcfclk(struct pp_smu *pp, int clock)
+{
+	const struct dc_context *ctx = pp->dm;
+	struct amdgpu_device *adev = ctx->driver_context;
+	void *pp_handle = adev->powerplay.pp_handle;
+	const struct amd_pm_funcs *pp_funcs = adev->powerplay.pp_funcs;
+
+	if (!pp_funcs || !pp_funcs->set_min_deep_sleep_dcefclk)
+		return;
+
+	pp_funcs->set_min_deep_sleep_dcefclk(pp_handle, clock);
+}
+
+void pp_rv_set_hard_min_dcefclk_by_freq(struct pp_smu *pp, int clock)
+{
+	const struct dc_context *ctx = pp->dm;
+	struct amdgpu_device *adev = ctx->driver_context;
+	void *pp_handle = adev->powerplay.pp_handle;
+	const struct amd_pm_funcs *pp_funcs = adev->powerplay.pp_funcs;
+
+	if (!pp_funcs || !pp_funcs->set_hard_min_dcefclk_by_freq)
+		return;
+
+	pp_funcs->set_hard_min_dcefclk_by_freq(pp_handle, clock);
+}
+
+void pp_rv_set_hard_min_fclk_by_freq(struct pp_smu *pp, int mhz)
+{
+	const struct dc_context *ctx = pp->dm;
+	struct amdgpu_device *adev = ctx->driver_context;
+	void *pp_handle = adev->powerplay.pp_handle;
+	const struct amd_pm_funcs *pp_funcs = adev->powerplay.pp_funcs;
+
+	if (!pp_funcs || !pp_funcs->set_hard_min_fclk_by_freq)
+		return;
+
+	pp_funcs->set_hard_min_fclk_by_freq(pp_handle, mhz);
+}
+
 void dm_pp_get_funcs_rv(
 		struct dc_context *ctx,
 		struct pp_smu_funcs_rv *funcs)
@@ -567,4 +619,9 @@ void dm_pp_get_funcs_rv(
 	funcs->set_display_requirement = pp_rv_set_display_requirement;
 	funcs->set_wm_ranges = pp_rv_set_wm_ranges;
 	funcs->set_pme_wa_enable = pp_rv_set_pme_wa_enable;
+	funcs->set_display_count = pp_rv_set_active_display_count;
+	funcs->set_min_deep_sleep_dcfclk = pp_rv_set_min_deep_sleep_dcfclk;
+	funcs->set_hard_min_dcfclk_by_freq = pp_rv_set_hard_min_dcefclk_by_freq;
+	funcs->set_hard_min_fclk_by_freq = pp_rv_set_hard_min_fclk_by_freq;
 }
+